Home > Vintages and Regions > Bordeaux > Bordeaux 2005 > Pessac-Léognan
Bordeaux 2005: Pessac-Léognan
Bordeaux 2005
En primeur
At Two Years
At Four Years
Pessac-Léognan
Whatever the quality of the vintage, the Pessac section at the annual IMW tasting is always a delight. Not because the wines are better than any other commune, as Pessac-Léognan is just as much at the whim of rain and rot as any other appellation, it is more that opportunities to taste Haut-Brion, La Mission Haut-Brion and La Tour Haut-Brion side-by-side don't come along very often. Indeed, as the latter of these three estates is now defunct, having been wound up with this very vintage and the vines and their produce absorbed into the other Haut-Brion wines, these opportunities will become increasingly rare.
Happily, the presence of even just two of the wines, Haut-Brion and La Mission, will be sufficient for most people (including myself), especially when partnered with the likes of Haut-Bailly, Pape-Clément and others as in this tasting. A comparison of the two first growths (La Mission being elevated to this level, if we refer to the 2009 Liv-Ex revision of the 1855 classification) is inevitable I suppose, and although in this vintage both are supreme wines I felt that on this showing, for my palate at least, Haut-Brion carries just a touch more majesty and a more brooding character which marks it out, ultimately, as the greater wine. La Mission is no feeble effort though, is extraordinarily close in terms of quality, and has a delightfully perfumed, tobacco-laced style. I would be ecstatic to be in possession of a bottle (or even better, a case) of either.
Elsewhere in the commune though there are great wines, too many to mention perhaps, as there was great consistency here, the disappointments in this admittedly small and select showing from the appellation rather rare. It might be better to point out those that are likely to give good value, and Malartic-Lagravière immediately springs to mind, with a delightfully fresh and open character, backed up by some substance. This, and perhaps Domaine de Chevalier, would be my top 'affordable' (in relative terms of course) wines to buy. (17/11/09)
Pessac-Léognan 2005 - Tasting Notes
Tasted at the IMW 2005 Claret Tasting in November 2009. Click
to locate stockists.
Chateau Brown 2005: Lovely nose, although a lot of toasty oak.
Great fruit, deep, complex, slightly smoky, very stylish. On the palate it is quite
sweet, attractive and structured, with lovely ripe tannins at it score, quite
grainy in character. Great acidity. Quite soft in composition but very complete.
Moderate texture, nicely balanced. Very good indeed. 17/20
![]()
Chateau Carbonnieux 2005:
Lovely and very typical, unforced Graves fruit on the nose, red berries with
gravel and tobacco, and there is a little edge of sweetness to it that tells us
the wine still has more development to do I think. The palate is soft, but
gently polished, with nice flesh and a very well integrated structure. Through
the middle the tannins show a little more, and there is good acidity too. It is
a little loosely held together today but there is certainly very good potential
here. There is purity to the flesh too, ripe tannins and an elegant style. Very
good indeed. 17-17.5+/20
![]()
Domaine de Chevalier
2005: A more reserved style, more dusty, but
still ripe. Very pure, polished fruit. Elegant, raspberries and other red
fruits. Rich though, a touch smoky too. Very full substance on entry, but pure
and polished, very linear. Finely rounded and harmonious, with really
fine-grained tannins and lovely, intense central fruit. Very complete.
Impressive wine. 17.5-18+/20
![]()
Chateau de Fieuzal 2005:
A very unusual nose here, dominated by cooked
fruit. An evolving wine, showing some overt undergrowth, forest floor and
tobacco characteristics, but all the time with that sweet-stewed element in the
background. Good weight on entry, where there are flavour characteristics similar
to those on the nose. A soft and gentle structure, with supple edges to the
tannins, although with a firmer characteristic at the core. This isn't showing
very well today and may not be typical. 15-16+?/20
![]()
Chateau Haut-Bailly 2005: Very dense, dark-fruited, pure and elegant
nose. Very aromatic. Pure and polished bramble fruits. A richer style
on the palate than some other wines. Very dark in character, slightly sooty
tannins, dark in structure and intent. Great purity too though, linear and
defined. A massively polished wine, impressive and stylish, but well framed and
deliciously appealing. Structured, but balanced. Great, lively, with very fresh
fruit. Long too. 18.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Haut-Brion 2005: A very fine nose here, pure, bright and
well-framed. Dark yet perfumed, with notes of bright balsamic, flower petals,
dark herbs. It has purity and elegance on the palate, a twisting presence first
of gently defined linear fruit, then a core of creamy, velvety tannins with just
a hint of graininess to them. Remarkably structured, firm and somewhat brooding,
but with a tangible texture to the fruit within. Quite gentle acidity, but well
balanced, with grip and length, this is a prodigious effort that will be just
divine with the appropriate period of cellaring. 19.5+/20
![]()
Chateau La Mission Haut-Brion 2005: A wonderful nose here; this
has an extra dimension compared to many of its peers. There is perfumed fruit,
highly aromatic but still dark and mysterious. Violets and rose petals are
blended in with elements of fresh stock, tar and tobacco. How enticing! The
palate seems very restrained considering the wine's exuberant character on the
nose, showing a much lighter presence of perfume, but more importantly it shows
a very elegant composition, a well defined, seamless, polished presence, bright
and fresh, vigorous and yet elegant. There is structure here, a core of ripe
tannin, bright acids, and this is certainly a banker for the long-haul. A superb
wine indeed. 19+/20
![]()
Chateau La Tour Haut-Brion 2005: A swan-song for La Tour Haut-Brion -
the final vintage. A
more masculine nose than La Mission. Darker, deeper, more restrained.
Nevertheless this wine also has some of those fine beef stock and tobacco notes,
although more hidden than with La Mission. And on the palate too, this is a less
generous and less flattering style than La Mission. It is polished and firm,
slightly stony in character, without the warm flesh of some other wines. A wave
of black pepper at the finish. There are more bones visible here, and
correspondingly less flesh. There is certainly an elegance to it though, and it
is unquestionably of high quality. 17.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Latour-Martillac
2005: A vibrantly perfumed nose here, with a
deliciously gamey, meaty quality to it, and a very direct and linear style of
dark fruits. With elements of gravel and tobacco, this is certainly showing some
good Graves characteristics. Slightly plump and polished style here, full of
fruit and overall attractive. Good substance, with a polished marble mouthfeel
although with a little more generosity than that suggests, and certainly a very
good composition. Impressive wine. 17.5+/20
![]()
Chateau La Louvière 2005: Rather dark on the nose, slightly brooding,
not open and expressive like some of the other wines. But there is a very good
feel to it, a restrained character, dense and dark berry fruit, with nuances of
perfumed aromatics around the edges. The more time I give it the better it
seems. The palate has a creamy start, and then some structure comes in to
underpin it in the midpalate. Like a number of other wines it isn't completely
together at the moment, and so it is perhaps lacking a little harmony today, but
all the desired components are here. We have rather polished, shiny fruit,
decent grip especially towards the finish and nice acids. Appealing wine and
good value perhaps? 17+/20
![]()
Chateau Malartic-Lagravière
2005: Autumn leaves and tobacco, fresh
red fruits, there is a lot of good Pessac-Léognan typicity here. There is a little
suggestion of density to it though, with slightly darker fruits in the
background, and richness alongside the fresh aromatics. A stylish wine on the
palate, fresh
and very nicely composed, with a great, integrated backbone of tannin and good
defining acidity. This is all brought together very well indeed. A lovely effort
by the Bonnie family.18+/20
![]()
Chateau Pape-Clément 2005: A nose dominated by oak here, fine and well
polished, although there is an impressive layer of fruit hiding behind it as
well. Aromatic, fresh and rich, with notes of loganberry and dark cherry. A
brilliant palate, pure with seamless fruit. There is a huge envelope of oak
around it at present but this merely needs time. Very grippy finish, the tannins
showing here, but it has balancing fruit for the structure throughout the
palate. This will need a long rest in the cellar. Although massive, still very lifted and
bright. Wonderful. 18.5+/20
![]()
Chateau Smith-Haut-Lafitte
2005: Lots of toasty oak on the nose here,
over tightly grained fruit. Smoky, charcoaly, wood-derived elements. Supple
entry, soft and well composed, perhaps just a little too reticent. Fruit seems
rather tightly packed in and is hiding behind a layer of oak that mirrors that
found on the nose. Soft, but with a nice harmony that suggests that this wine
will come good with time, although it is difficult to pass authoritative
judgement today. 17-17.5+?/20
![]()
