Home > Vintages and Regions > Other Wines > New Zealand Wine Annual Tasting 2007
New Zealand Wine Annual Tasting 2007 Part 2
This
is part two of this look at the wines of New Zealand today, facilitated by the
annual Wines of New Zealand tasting which visited Edinburgh earlier this year.
In part one I focussed on the white
wines, mainly Sauvignon Blanc as you might expect, but also a number of other
varieties, both expected and unexpected. In part two I deal with the red wines, and
again we might anticipate one variety more than others here. That variety is, of
course, Pinot Noir.
Indeed, there were many examples of Pinot Noir on the day; this is New Zealand's new signature wine, but whereas Sauvignon has been widely available and has usually been sold at a price within the reach of many, neither of these statements are true of Pinot Noir. This is still very much a niche wine, despite its financial significance to the wine industry. What was disheartening to see, at this tasting at least, is how many producers seem to have jumped on the Pinot bandwagon and yet have failed to back up their label with the necessary quality; there were a surprising number of wines which disappointed with coarseness, a disjointed structure and sometimes a hot and unattractive character. Fortunately, there were also some - one or two at least - which showed why New Zealand must surely now be regarded as this variety's second home after Burgundy.
Looking beyond Pinot Noir, there were a few other varieties on show; looking at this admittedly very small cohort of wines was quite depressing, and I hope isn't truly reflective of New Zealand's capabilities with Cabernet and Syrah. Nevertheless, amongst this crowd, there was a star or two, in the shape of Craggy Range. (13/12/07)
New Zealand Wine 2007 Part 2 - Tasting Notes
Tasted in November 2007. Click
to locate
stockists:
Palliser Estate Pinot Noir (Martinborough) 2005: This has a nicely
dense colour, and this is complemented by a firm, dense, animalistic,
cherry-gamey character on the nose. Full, rounded, attractive, somewhat chalky
in style but with good substance and nice, direct fruit. This rises in intensity
on the finish with more waves of fruit. Nicely composed wine. 16-16.5/20
![]()
Carrick Unravelled Pinot Noir (Central Otago) 2005: This cuvée
accommodates the fruit of younger vines and lesser plots. It has a rather smoky,
gamey nose and a feral, cherry fruit character. Firm substance on the palate,
straightforward cherry fruit character, perhaps a touch coarse and bitter. Quite
grippy, and quite a bit of extraction too. Slightly hot finish. Pleasant enough
though. 14/20
![]()
Carrick Pinot Noir (Central Otago) 2003: This is showing maturity,
with an orange-tinged rim on inspection and a hot, smoky, spicy, bacon and game
character on the nose. Firmly composed, showing lots of structure and tannin,
and not really an elegant style. Nicely extracted though. It seems a little top
heavy. I suspect it may be better with food though. 16/20
![]()
Mount Difficulty Roaring Meg Pinot Noir (Central Otago) 2007: Fairly
pale wine. This has a really attractive nose, showing dense herby, cherry fruit.
There is some appropriate oak, and a little roasted meat nuance to it.
Appealing. Straightforward enough at first on the palate, but showing a good
composition, a good balance of fruit and acids, before rounding off in a grippy,
peppery finish. This is good. 16+/20
![]()
Mount Difficulty Pinot Noir (Central Otago) 2006: A denser colour.
Rather closed here, less interest than the Roaring Meg at present, showing
nuances of aroma at most. On the palate there is very good structure, with good
depth and an excellent, sensuous, chalk-tinged texture. Lots of appeal and
substance here. When this opens up to reveal more aroma and flavour, it will be
just fine. 17+/20
![]()
Craggy Range Te Muna Road Vineyard Pinot Noir (Martinborough) 2006: A
rather bright, pink-cherry hue. Not a nose with a lot of impact at first, just
showing some appealing cherry character, with a subtle lick of oak. The palate
reveals a supple style, with lovely structure, some extract and a good texture.
Lovely fruit and an admirable balance too. There is grip and also style here.
Very good indeed. 17+/20
![]()
Craggy Range Te Kahu Gimblett Gravels Vineyard Merlot Cabernet Sauvignon
(Hawke's Bay) 2004: This is in fact 77% Merlot, 11% Cabernet Sauvignon, 6%
Malbec and 6% Cabernet Franc. A glossy, moderately dense hue, with floral notes,
violets, wild herbs and a very elegant style. Supple, creamy, textured but still
very elegant on the palate, with appealing flavour and a lovely, integrated
composition. One of the best wines (if not the best) wines of the
tasting. 17.5+/20
![]()
Hunter's Pinot Noir (Marlborough) 2006: A bright cherry-red appearance
here, with cherries and spicy oaak on the nose. Rather dilute style, light in
character, bitty-peppery with simple cherry fruit. There is a little gaminess,
but overall this is very straightforward. 15/20
![]()
Kim Crawford Pinot Noir (Marlborough) 2006: A pale cherry-red, with
bright beetroot and cherry fruit on the nose. This is another simple wine,
showing a gamy character, but mostly marked by one-dimensional cherry fruit.
Nevertheless it has a clean character, nice direction, and there is a little
substance through the midpalate. Afterwards, though, it fades away with a
slightly bitter finish. 14.5/20
![]()
Kim Crawford Small Parcel Anderson Valley Pinot Noir (Marlborough) 2005:
There is a little more density here, both when looking at the colour and on the
nose. Dark fruits, sweet cherry, and some oak too on a nice, open nose. It has a
well defined palate, with a good texture and a backbone of moderate acidity.
Appealing, ripe cherry fruit. Good potential here. 16.5+20
![]()
Ata Rangi Crimson Pinot Noir (Martinborough) 2006: Quite a pale,
cherry-red hue here. Not a very expressive nose, a little beetrooty perhaps,
also notes of canned strawberries, all told I don't find the aromatic profile
the most appealing. A light style on the palate, lacking concentration, but with
bright acidity and a nice, chalk-edged texture. This may perhaps develop more
interest in bottle which would be pleasing to see. A rather resinous, slightly
bitter finish. 14+/20
![]()
Ata Rangi Wild Earth Pinot Noir (Central Otago) 2005: There is a
little more colour here than found in the Crimson, but it is still quite a
transparent wine. It has rather subdued fruit on the nose. Again, here we have a
rather chalky element to the palate, and I feel it lacks concentration. There is
a slightly bitter edge to the structure, and a bit of grip. It seems a little
harshly composed. It isn't to my tastes. 13.5+/20
![]()
Matakana Estate Pinot Noir (Marlborough) 2005: A nice cherry note on
the nose, but this is overwhelmed by acetic, balsamic notes. The palate is
rather chalky, quite broad and fleshy with lots of texture, but that acetic note
carries through. Grippy, firm style, not elegant, with a peppery flavour. I
can't rate this wine very highly at all. 13.5/20
![]()
Matakana Estate Cabernet Franc (Hawke's Bay) 2006: This is really not
showing very much on the nose, and the same is true of the palate. It has a
textured, chalky structure which rather resembles that of the Pinot. Good grip,
nice acidity, fairly light, but currently quite closed down and showing little
flavour, just a little sense of toffee oak on the finish. Difficult to judge.
14.5-15.5+/20
![]()
Matakana Estate Merlot (Hawke's Bay) 2005: This actually includes 15%
Cabernet Franc in the blend. The nose is not so expressive, but it is showing
some nice plum character that holds a little promise. A very firmly structured
wine, peppery and grippy, dry and chalky, but not showing a lot of texture with
it. There is quite a grippy finish too. This perhaps has potential, but it is
difficult to judge. 15.5+?/20
![]()
Matakana Estate Syrah (Hawke's Bay) 2005: A moderate depth of colour
at best, and some rather lifted, open, bright fruit on the nose, which is a very
positive point after the last three wines. Little subtleties of Syrah and oak -
chocolate, spearmint - flit in and out of view. On the palate, surprisingly
light despite the attractive nose, not showing the concentration or weight you
might have expected, although it does pick up a little. Slightly stewed fruit
character. Interesting to taste, but not a patch on the Aurora Vineyard's Syrah
- the only other New Zealand example of this variety that I have ever tasted. 14/20
![]()
Home - Site index - Site updated May 14, 2008 - © The Winedoctor 2000 - 2008 - Wine Scores - RSS
