Home > Vintages and Regions > Loire > Loire 2009 > Touraine & Centre, January 2011
Loire 2009: Touraine & Centre
Although my Loire 2009 vintage review makes clear that 2009 wasn't a year entirely free of difficulties for the Touraine vineyards, when we home in on the leading white wine appellations of Vouvray and Montlouis I have been convinced, by multiple tastings of the wines, that this is a very high quality vintage for the region. I know the wines are not to everybody's taste though, with some finding the somewhat richer and riper textures a little bit over the top. For me, however, that certainly isn't an issue, and from the seductive secs of Huet and others, up to the very sweetest cuvées, this is a vintage in which there is a lot of pleasure to be found.
Loire 2009: Touraine
Like Anjou, Touraine is a complex vinicole, giving us dry whites and reds, and sweeter wines too, sometimes with a strong botrytis influence akin to the wines of the Layon and Aubance, sometimes not. And not only do we have both famous appellations, Vouvray and Chinon for instance, but there are also more cultish interests such as Cour-Cheverny (home to Romorantin) or Jasnières (Chenin Blanc and Pineau d'Aunis), as well as more 'generic' appellations which should not be ignored, as what at first glance appears to be a basic Touraine may in fact be a high class effort from the likes of Clos Roche Blanche, Henri Marionnet or similar.
Starting
with Vouvray and Montlouis, I have already indicated that I have sensed a lot of
joy within the drier cuvées, even if some are not all that dry. There are some
stunning wines from the likes of Xavier Weisskopf,
Lise and Bertrand Jousset,
Frantz Saumon (not tasted here) and others. And as for those sweeter cuvées,
these are delicious, and they will be there for the taking. François Chidaine
(pictured right, at the 2011 Salon des Vins de Loire) made his first
super-sweet Les Lys since the 2003 vintage, and Noël Pinguet at
Domaine Huet was able to create a Cuvée
Constance, the exalted flagship wine of the estate, the first vintage he has
been able to do this since 2005. Meanwhile, at
La Taille aux Loups, Jacky Blot will be releasing a
Cuvée Romulus, boasting an impressive 150 g/l of residual sugar. Sadly
this tasting did not feature this soon-to-be legendary wines, but I have tasted
them at the 2011 Salon des Vins de Loire, and my tasting notes are included in
my various domaine updates.
Moving on to look at the red wines of Touraine, these are exceptional. This is, in my opinion, one of the greatest Loire Valley vintages for red wines in recent decades. Having said that, the more circumspect Loire vignerons, who are perhaps not as programmed to trot out the hype in the way that the Bordeaux proprietors are, have never raved about the vintage in this manner. Meeting Matthieu Baudry in early 2011 in order to taste his latest releases, he described the vintage as being very good "commercially", whereas the 2010 vintage seemed to garner more of his respect, showing a much greater definition and more "classic" style. Rather akin to these two vintages in Bordeaux, I would be happy with either in my cellar, but I in the case of the Loire I would probably fall down on the side of 2009 more often than 2010...so far, anyway.
As for those more cultish wines and the mysterious 'generic' appellations, the only wine from a less famous appellation tasted here was from Henri Marionnet of Domaine de la Charmoise. Previous tastings in 2010 and 2011, however, have suggested there are many good wines to be found in this vintage, from the likes of Bellivière and Clos Roche Blanche.
Loire 2009: Centre
As was the case with some of the Touraine vineyards, the 2009 vintage for some of the central vignerons was a story not of harvest and celebration, but one of devastation. Some vineyards were destroyed by hail, especially in Menetou-Salon, an appellation that was celebrating - although having your entire harvest wiped out by hail undoubtedly dampens the celebratory spirit - its 50th anniversary. Many vineyards in the Coteaux du Giennois, as well as some of the Sancerre communes, were similarly affected. Yields varied remarkably, from normal, to half-normal, to nil in some cases.
Perhaps of greater impact on the style than the yields is the alcohol content, which is certainly worthy of comment in this vintage. Facing low yields, some growers held on, waiting for the usual harvest rain to swell the grapes a little (entirely legal of course, unlike irrigation, or adding water to the fermenting vat, which is not). But the rains never came and, returning to the issues I raised in my Muscadet and Anjou instalment, the result for a number of wines was overly low acidity and higher sugars, the latter translating into higher alcohol levels. The sight of Pascal Reverdy's finger-pointing and Cheshire-cat grin in early 2010, when I tasted his 2009 Sancerre Les Anges Lots and failed to detect that it possessed 15% alcohol is not only a memory that will last forever, but one which will also serve as a reminder why the Sancerres, Pouillys, Menetous and similar from this vintage will simply not appeal to all.
Nevertheless I have had some superb wines from 2009, from Reverdy himself of course, and also from François Crochet, but the trio tasted here were not up to the same high standard. In part this relates to vintage style, the aforementioned acid and alcohol, but also probably reflects the presence of oak in some of these wines. Although I am not allergic to the combination of Sauvignon Blanc and oak, not at all, I am quite particular about how and when the two should be combined. (30/6/11)
Touraine & Centre 2009: Tasting Notes
These wines were tasted in January 2011 at Charles Sydney's annual
tasting in London. Click
to
locate stockists.
Domaine de la Taille aux Loups Vouvray Clos de la Bretonnière 2009:
Clean and crunchy Chenin fruit character here, with beautifully crystalline
fruit on the nose, pure and lifted. The palate follows on in much the same
style, showing delightful fruit concentration, sweet and defined Chenin
character, backed up by a light grip and plenty of firm, fine acidity. Supple,
minerally yet rich and with a fleshy touch of residual sugar. An absolute
delight. 17/20
![]()
Château Gaudrelle Vouvray Moelleux Réserve Personelle 2009:
From a half bottle. The nose is very expressive and characterful, with honeyed
elements redolent of sweet peach and apricot conserve, both suggestive of a
botrytis component, combined with a delightfully fresh and crunchy frame.
Unsurprisingly this continues on the palate, all beeswax and honey, sweet
sugar-dipped peach and tropical fruits, with a wonderfully dry, crunchy, caramel
tinge. This will be delicious, and it will be ready very soon. My only complaint
is that the acidity struggles to make its presence felt; it is there, but it is
very subtle. For that reason I can't mark it any higher. 16/20
![]()
Domaine de la Taille aux Loups Montlouis Rémus 2009:
This has a smoky character to the nose, a little sulphurous if anything,
although there is a gritty freshness to it as well. The palate has a very bold,
firm, solid character at first, before relaxing in the middle to show a more
open and yet bright construction, with deliciously crystalline acid fruit at its
core. The residual is very low I think, but not rock-bottom. I think in its
present state it is very difficult to judge but the raw materials underneath it
all are clearly of high quality. It will need cellar time but should be very
good. 17/20
![]()
Domaine de la Nobliae Chinon 2009: This is very classic and true to
the appellation on the nose, with bright and stony plum and raspberry fruit
alongside the complexities of smoky char-grilled capsicum and celery seed, a
surprising tinge of green considering the ripeness of the vintage. The substance
on the palate matches this, a stony texture with a fresh seam of forest fruits
in the middle. Hold in the mouth and it shows a really appealing savoury edge.
This is good wine. 15.5/20
![]()
Couly-Dutheil Chinon Domaine René Couly 2009:
Some very pure and polished fruit on the nose here, substantial and showing an
appealing typicity. Also a fine cherry stone substance to it. Nicely fleshed out
on entry though, still with a very well defined acid backbone and light grip of
tannin too, slowly building in the mouth. Full, sappy, a touch juicy even, and
very refreshing. Cleaner and a little less vegetal than some of the preceding
wines. 15.5/20
![]()
Charles Joguet Chinon Cuvée Terroir 2009:
There is something very distinctive about Joguet wines in some vintages, a funk
that comes not from the soil or the fruit, but from Brett. It's not in every
Joguet cuvée (although there is always bottle variation with Brett), just in
some, but it is here on the nose of this wine, giving a slightly feral,
animal-wool scent to the fruit. There is only a trace of 4-ethylphenol, the
responsible molecule, on the palate though, which shows a fine-grained
stone-edged layer of rather spicy fruit, with a supple and mouth-filling
texture, balanced out by some gentle acidity. Despite that funky nose I rather
like it; it needs a year or two but it will drink very well, provided there is
no unwanted blooming of its wilder side. 15/20
![]()
Charles Joguet Chinon Varennes du Grand Clos 2009:
There is no Brett in this wine (or in this bottle I should say), unlike the
Cuvée Terroir. There are ultra-ripe, ultra-lush layers of fruit here, very rich
with a forest fruit character, with a gritty-sugar, cherry, plum and damson
style. Remarkably high-toned, perfumed, with notes of violet and something of a
crystalline edge to the fruit despite the overt ripeness and sweetness. A
polished style overall, a little savoury at the very start, with a lightly
peppery edge to the fruit, with a massive amount of grip and acid coming through
the core of the wine. Late harvesting and maybe even a rather energetic
extraction here, giving this a massive, feature-laden palate. It seems a little
top heavy, over-extracted and atypical, but it will be interesting to see which
way it goes. 14.5?/20
![]()
Domaine de la Butte Bourgueil Le Haut de la Butte 2009:
A very expressive wine here, very pure and lifted in terms of its fruit
character, which has a sweet, gritty, perfumed cherry note. This character comes
through onto the palate, which has a light and rather gritty-crunchy style,
although with a supple layer of fruit laid over the perfumed inner core. Overall
this is very distinctive, bright and persuasive. It has a good style which needs
a year or two in the cellar but which will drink very nicely in time I think.
16/20
![]()
Domaine de la Butte Bourgueil Mi-Pente 2009:
Some really dark and glossy fruit here, with just a twist of volatile acid,
showing the high-toned and very ripe nature of the fruit. Still carrying a few
winemaking scents, a little whisky mash, perhaps partly related to the barrels.
This comes through on the palate too, which has an incredibly bright and
high-toned layer of fruit, fresh and with a good core of grippy tannin around
it. Fine acidity too. The flavours are incredibly primary, the fruit very
high-toned and perfumed. At present this needs to be left well alone, but the
raw materials are very impressive. 18/20
![]()
Charles Joguet Chinon Clos de la Dioterie 2009:
Again a high-toned, fruit-rich style, perfumed and fresh but indicative of
plenty of ultra-ripe fruit again. A tinge of smoke here, over the sweetly
fleshed-out plum and damson aromas. This perfumed chalky-fruit character comes
through onto the palate too, and there is a little oak coming through from the
nose here also. Good acidity, gentle but appropriate, well-hidden beneath the
fruit, and some ripe and supple tannins too. Interesting and less extracted than
some of the preceding wines. There is plenty of chewy grip at the finish
through. Again, much promise here. And no Brett, for the moment. 17.5/20
![]()
Domaine de la Charmoise Touraine Vinifera Cot 2009:
A very typical Malbec nose here, showing almost gamey fruit, deep and certainly
richly characterful. The palate carries a more stony fruit character, dry but
perfumed and chalky, bright and lifted, not richly textured but certainly full
of flavour. It does have a very feminine feel to it though. An interesting wine.
14.5/20
![]()
Vincent Pinard Sancerre Cuvée Nuance 2009: rather an appealing fresh
and floral character to the nose here, just a little oaky honeyed sweetness to
the character of the wine, but also a well defined and very expressive layer of
fruit. On the palate it shows a rather wound up, dry and golden-fruited
character, with good grip and substance but not a lot of the bright fruit or
elegance that we might expect. Good acidity under it all, something of a zesty
orange character too, and lots of grip. But rather a solid and substantial wine
for the appellation, tinged by oak, and with a big grippy finish. 15/20
![]()
Vincent Pinard Sancerre Cuvée Harmonie 2009: A gentle layer of softly
waxed oak on the nose here, masking any fruit character than there might be
beneath. On the palate a good depth and breadth to the wine, well composed with
a charming substance and also a bright acid core, but the flavours are here also
dominated by the oak, which also brings with it a big, grippy style which claws
down the palate. Again, as with the Cuvée Nuance, not what I would want from the
appellation. 13.5?/20
![]()
Alain Cailbourdin Pouilly-Fumé Triptyque 2009: This wine has the
golden crunch of new oak on the nose, and the palate can do little else but
follow on. Rather an esoteric style through the middle, full and rich, endowed
with plenty of fresh acidity and also some good juicy fruit character, but it is
all encased in a layer of golden toasted oak. The raw material is clearly of
good quality. I know this wine has its fans, but I find myself wondering if the
oak ever subside. 13?/20
![]()
