Home > Vintages and Regions > Loire > Loire Update: Nicolas Joly
Nicolas Joly Update, February 2010
Nicolas Joly
This update relates to wines tasted in February 2010.
For more on this estate, including all my relevant tasting notes, see my Nicolas Joly profile.
It doesn't seem that long since Nicolas Joly last featured on Winedoctor; nevertheless it was more than a year ago, an update prompted by my tasting of his three wines from the 2007 vintage. My Joly profile received a major overhaul, and in it I paid particular attention to the views of other writers on the wines. This isn't something I make a habit of on Winedoctor, but with Joly's wines the opinions are so divergent it is vital that any profile of the man and the estate acknowledge this. Depending on who you read, the wines are either glorious homages to Bacchus or tragic train-wrecks, these seemingly polar-opposite opinions paraphrasing Andrew Jefford or perhaps Clive Coates in the case of the former, and Jacqueline Friedrich or Richard Kelley MW in the case of the latter.
One criticism frequently levied against the wines by the 'train-wreck' crowd is that they show signs of oxidation. Joly would dispute this, stating that tasters are confusing oxidation with maturity, and that the tasters simply don't understand or 'get' the wines, but I don't think this is an appropriate response to experienced tasters and holders of the MW certificate such as those above. Read Kelley's notes and you can sense the experience, thinking and consideration that lies behind them. Admittedly, many of my own experiences have been positive, but that is hardly surprising; if the problem here is random oxidation, with the restricted addition of sulphur in the cellar a possible culprit (perhaps compounded by cork variation) then there will always be some good bottles (which have come my way it seems) and some bad ones too. In addition, oxygen takes time to carry out its destructive work, and many of my recent experiences are dominated by tastings of very youthful samples poured by Virginie Joly. Not only are these bottles too young to show the oxidative degeneration that might await them, they are naturally screened before pouring; this is certain to improve my hit rate of good bottles.
Despite
my good experiences, the reports of prematurely degenerate bottles disappearing
into an oxidised fug abound, a disheartening read when one considers the exemplary, text-book biodynamic care in
Joly's vineyards. If restricted sulphur use is the culprit here, then we should
note that Joly is certainly not alone. There is understandably a desire within the
natural wine movement to eschew sulphur, but if taken to the extreme the results
are inevitable, and all the wines begin to taste
the same - oxidised. Although the reduction of the use of chemicals in
agriculture and viticulture is laudable, those who turn out such wines have, in
my opinion, gone too far. It is
a particular bugbear of mine, one which I wrote about in my report of the
2010 Renaissance
tasting. Yes, please adhere to your natural winemaking philosophies, but
also please note that the end product is to be consumed, and is intended to give pleasure. A glass of sour, cidery, oxidised Chenin Blanc holds no appeal, and is
not fit for either purpose. And if you are making wine from one of the greatest
terroirs of the Loire, fashioning wines that might need to age for
decades to show their full potential, then maybe those wines should be set up
for that time period when they go into the bottle. To do otherwise is, in my
opinion, to
disrespect the land, the terroir if you will, just as much as the
rampant application of fertiliser, herbicides and pesticides would do.
With some fingers pointing at practices in the cellar, a number of knowledgeable writers have openly expressed the thought that perhaps a new approach to winemaking might be the answer to the problems at Coulée de Serrant. And, only naturally, many look to the next generation, the aforementioned Virginie (pictured above, at the 2009 Dégustation Renaissance), to provide the solution. I first met Virginie in 2003 at the Château de la Roches-aux-Moines, their property very close to the Clos de la Coulée de Serrant. If I remember correctly she had not long returned home from studying, including some time in Finland. It was a long time before I met her again, perhaps six years; during the intervening years she has gradually taken on more responsibility at the family domaine, both in the vineyard and cellar. As it stands at present, however, her philosophies seem to mirror those of her father, something the medical cynic in me might say was reflected by her studies, which included alternative medicine. But it is the wines that concern us here. Having tasted a number of cuvées in recent vintages I have not seen any dramatic development in the style of the wines, so I am not convinced that Virginie will be the saviour that many feel the Clos de la Coulée de Serrant needs.
Now onto the current wines. I met Virginie again in early 2010 to taste the latest vintage, this time 2008. Still youthful, they tasted very clean and rich; the controversies will come later as these wines fight the vagaries of cork permeability and the effects of oxygen without an adequate blanket of sulphur. It is also notable that they all possess quite marked concentrations of alcohol, although the first wine, Les Vieux Clos, weighing in with 14.5%, didn't display this on the palate. The second and final wines in the trio, however, the Clos de la Bergerie with a prodigious 15.5% and the Clos de la Coulée de Serrant, with just 15%, did show some heat on the finish. My scores reflect my opinion of the wines as they taste now (that is only fair), but suffice to say that there are sufficient warning signs here to make oxidation and alcohol-averse drinkers very cautious with regard to buying these wines, regardless of how appealing they might be to taste at this stage. (4/8/10)
Nicolas Joly, February 2010 - Tasting Notes
These wines were tasted in February 2010. All my notes on the wines of
Nicolas Joly and the Clos de la Coulée de Serrant, including those below, are collated under my
Nicolas Joly profile. Click
to locate stockists.
Nicolas Joly Savennières Les Vieux Clos 2008: Alcohol 14.5%, residual
sugar 3.7 g/l. An expressive nose, full of apples and pears, youthful, quite
clean, certainly with some style. Rather gentle in terms of its impact on the
nose and palate too. It has some structure though, and is perhaps still rather
barrel-influenced, showing dried stone fruit with a firm and savoury edge. A lot
of substance here. Powerful structure and acidity. This is one for the cellar.
16.5-17+/20
![]()
Nicolas Joly Savennières Roches-aux-Moines Clos de la Bergerie 2008:
Alcohol 15.5%, residual sugar 0.8 g/l. Seemingly quite elegant on the nose, more
refined than the Vieux Clos, but also less expressive too I think. It has a huge
presence in the mouth, but it is all structure and no flattery at present. It is
grippy (oak-derived again?) through the middle and into the finish, and is
certainly not approachable for drinking any time soon. I find this wine rather
difficult to judge at the moment but it could come very good - if it can carry
that huge weight of alcohol. Rather warm towards the end. 16.5-17.5+?/20
![]()
Nicolas Joly Clos de la Coulée de Serrant 2008: This is a mere 15%,
with 1.0 g/l residual sugar. It is more open and seemingly more accessible on the
nose than the Clos de la Bergerie or Les Vieux Clos, which I find curious and
surprising, showing a defined, rather rich stone fruit character. Very rounded,
honeyed and composed on the palate, with a fine linear presence and plenty of
grip again. There is a little heat in the finish here too, but overall it is
nicely composed. Once more, though, a wine on which it is difficult to make
conclusive comment. 17-17.5+?/20
![]()
