Home > Vintages and Regions > Loire > Loire Update: François Chidaine
François Chidaine Update, January 2011
François Chidaine
This update relates to wines tasted in January 2011.
For more on this estate, including all my relevant tasting notes, see my François Chidaine profile.
One of the most convincing wines I have tasted from François Chidaine has to be the 2008 Clos Habert, a wine which I had the good sense to stock up on last year when I visited La Cave Insolite, the shop that François and his wife Manuela run on the riverside in Montlouis. It was a vintage that favoured the demi-sec wines of Vouvray and apparently Montlouis too, as I recently reiterated in my latest report on Domaine Huet in which a lone representative of 2008 sneaked in amongst the other wines, which were predominantly from the 2009 and 2010 vintages.
Tasting it again this year only confirmed my opinion of this wine; of course there were a few other wines also up for tasting and I diligently worked my way through the entire portfolio in several vintages, I think to the amusement of François and his team who are perhaps more used to people dipping in and tasting one or two wines that take their fancy. Such as the 2008 Clos Habert, I suppose. No such easy-going approach for me though, and we kicked off with a selection of wines from 2007 and 2008, both vintages now well settled in bottle, before moving into more recent times with 2009 and the embryos that represent the 2010 vintage.
Although for the more recent years I tasted within the vintage, that is
tasting everything from 2009 before progressing to 2010, for the slightly older
wines I tasted according to style, starting with the drier cuvées such as Les
Bournais and Les Choisilles, regardless of vintage, before working my way up to
the more sugar-rich Le Bouchet, Les Tuffeaux and Clos Habert. I have decided to
leave my notes here in this order, as I thought it may be a useful way to
illustrate the spectrum of styles made by François (pictured right).
In the 2007/2008 mix it is perhaps not surprising that the aforementioned Clos Habert stood out as a superstar wine, so let us just acknowledge that and look at some of the other wines served alongside. From the same vintage Les Tuffeaux and Le Bouchet, both carrying similar levels of residual sugar, showed very well, perhaps unsurprisingly so considering that this style was strongly favoured in 2008. Although the drier wines from this vintage were admirable, the quality did not match that found in the more demi-sec cuvées. And on the whole 2007 lagged behind somewhat; again that is not to dismiss the quality found here, there are many sterling efforts, with Le Bouchet being my favourite on the day, but I found I preferred the wines of 2008 on the whole.
Moving onto 2009, I have to admit I would be nonplussed by anybody who could not find pleasure in these wines. It was, says François, a very favourable vintage with a consistent, warm growing season, and this shows through in the range he has produced, which encompass the full spectrum of possibilities, right from the bone-dry Montlouis Clos du Breuil with just 2 g/l residual sugar right up to the moelleux cuvées Les Lys and the as yet unnamed moelleux Vouvray, which boast 105 and 135 g/l residual sugar respectively. It is, says François, very rare for him to produce such a broad spread of styles, and it is also not that often we get to see Les Lys - the last time François was blessed with fruit suitable for the production of this cuvée was the 2003 vintage. There was broad success to match the breadth of the range, and for my palate it was Le Bouchet, carrying 27 g/l residual sugar, that was the most striking wine on the day. Nevertheless there is something here from everyone, dry wines of high quality such as Le Bournais, available in both standard (from grafted vines) and Franc de Pied (from ungrafted vines) formats.
Tasting at Domaine Huet I found the 2010 vintage to be one that favoured the drier wines and this feeling continued when tasting with François. Most impressive in the 2010 line up, none of which have yet been bottled (so there are no analyses for technical data such as residual sugar, and my scores remain ranged and provisional) were the dry wines, notably Les Argiles, Les Choisilles and Les Bournais. François describes the vintage as quite difficult, but I sense that his major achievement was in calming the nerves of his pickers; as the rain arrived early during harvest-time the more edgy members of the picking team were keen to get out and bring in the fruit before the rot set in. François countenanced patience and the wisdom of this decision was borne out as the weather improved and the pickers were subsequently able to bring in dry, healthy and importantly riper fruit. This is a vintage which, generalising, although less rich than 2009 does come across as more flattering than 2008. On the whole I like the style in 2009 best of all, but I certainly won't be overlooking the sec cuvées from 2010. (19/4/11)
François Chidaine, January 2011 - Tasting Notes
These wines were tasted in Angers in January 2011. I have presented
my notes in reverse vintage order, from 2010 moving backwards to 2007, although on the day I tasted the finished
2007s and 2008s first, followed by 2009 and finally 2010. Within the 2009 and
2010 notes the wines are presented in order of tasting,
hence the mix of Vouvray and Montlouis notes. I have also followed this plan
with the 2007/2008 mix, to give some indication of how these wines relate to one
another. All my notes on the wines of
François Chidaine, including those below, are collated under my
François Chidaine profile. Click
to locate stockists.
François describes 2010 as richer than 2008, but less so than 2009. The harvest needed careful management, holding pack the pickers during the rains, eventually letting go of the leash once the fruit had dried.
François Chidaine Montlouis Clos du Breuil 2010:
The wine from Clos du Breuil is always vinified dry. This vintage has youthful
apples and pears on the nose, light and lifted, with a perfumed pink-fleshed
character. An attractive palate, fresh and rather juicy in style, with good
fruit supported by a very attractive punchy style of acidity. Light, still
showing some fermentation-related aromas and flavour though. All the same,
supple, fresh and cleansing. Good. 16.5-17.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Vouvray Les Argiles 2010: This is as always an assemblage
of several parcels, the vines aged 40 years on average. Nose has a fresh, open,
juicy yellow plum style of fruit. Wow - on the palate this is just beautiful,
showing amazing acidity and freshness here, with great minerality and style to
it. It has a powerfully broad, mouth-tingling substance. Just wonderful
character here, but this is a very early taste in this wine's life; but if it
keeps this vigour this will be a fabulous wine. 17-18/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Choisilles 2010: This cuvée usually includes
fruit from Clos Renard and Les Epinais although these also give fruit to the moelleux
cuvée when the vintage is suitable. Sweet still-fermenting apples and pears
here, still clearly very youthful. A fine presence on the palate, with a very
appealing gentle texture to the wine cut through by a precise, defined,
crunchy-mineral acidity. Great minerality here. This could be delicious.
17-18/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Bournais 2010:
Whether this cuvée is dry or sweet depends on the vintage. Substantial fruit on
the nose here, it as still well defined though, and I find the same on the
palate which shows substantial fruit quality, and texture too, but with a
defined and bright acidity behind it. And there is a lovely mineral spice coming
through at the end. Overall this is beautifully appealing and fresh. Again, huge
potential here. 17-18/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Clos Habert Demi-Sec 2010: The soils here are
limestone and clay, the vines 60-years old,
and the wine usually a demi-sec. Fine, perfumed, bright and rather
feminine apples and stone fruits on the nose for a start. The palate is lovely,
fleshy and rich, with moderate acidity and a light minerality. An attractive
style but the structural components are only just adequate for the residual
sugar at present. It has a seductive character though. 16.5-17.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Tuffeaux 2010: This is a non-site specific
cuvée, taking fruit from across all sites, usually gently sec tendre to
demi-sec or thereabouts. A very polished, white stone feel to the nose here, with
yellow-gold fruits, star fruit and white grapes rubbed over the top. A deliciously
fleshy style on the palate, full and rich, but again the acidity is quite well
hidden here although the mineral component does have a very fine, needle-like
quality to it. Fresh, balanced, some light grip in the finish. Pretty and very appropriate for the vintage which I think is better suited to the
sec style. Great mineral finish though. 16.5-17.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Vouvray Le Bouchet 2010: This cuvée is generally sweet,
demi-sec or moelleux, and is sourced from 50-year old vines on
clay-limestone terroirs. A very distinct style on the nose here, showing strong fruit elements,
with a slightly dried-fruit character. A lovely presence on the palate though, supple and
polished, with the same gentle level of acids and minerals shown by the preceding
demi-sec cuvées. Perhaps just a little more convincing here though. Yes,
through the midpalate there is a greater lift and definition to it. If this is
maintained this will be lovely. 17-18/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Moelleux 2010: Principally sourced from
Clos Renard and Les Epinais, made when the vintage favours a moelleux cuvée. This embryonic wine has some bright yellow-gold fruit
on the nose. It has a soft,
sweet and golden character, with a very fine seam of minerality running through the very
core of the wine, around a very appealing and polished layer of sweet crystalline
fruit. This is much more convincing than the equivalent demi-sec, with a
finer fruit purity and lovely acidity. A great, very convincing style, with
vigorous acidity and minerals. 17.5-18.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Vouvray Moelleux 2010: An assemblage
from several sites, first produced in 2009; François says it is not yet named -
a statement that clearly places it alongside Les Lys in the portfolio, a Vouvray
equivalent. A fine density to the fruit here, concentrated and golden, very
polished and pure. A solid style. This concentration comes through on the palate
which shows a heady, mellifluous style. The acidity at first seems a little
muted but in the midpalate it does come through nicely, although perhaps not the
level of the Montlouis Moelleux tasted alongside. An attractive polished style,
rich and yet elegant and well defined, just not with the tingling and exciting
backbone that I would really like to see. 16.5-17.5/20
![]()
François says the 2009 was a very consistent vintage, one which unusually allowed him to produce the full range of Chidaine wines, right up to Les Lys.
François Chidaine Vouvray Les Argiles 2009: An assemblage
of several parcels, the vines having an average age of 40 years. Residual sugar
5 g/l in this vintage, which was bottled earlier than usual in August 2010 and
released in November the same year after the low-volume 2008 sold out. It has
rather a honeyed, gently expressive style on the nose, with perfumed, polished
and limestoney fruit. A lovely supple style on the palate, dry and with lovely
balancing acidity. Supple in terms of fruit and texture and yet with a lovely
acid and mineral core coming up at the finish. 17/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Clos du Breuil 2009:
This cuvée is always vinified until dry; in this vintage it has 2 g/l residual
sugar. Attractive and polished on the nose, with a soapy and minerally edge.
Full of lemon zest, and very stylish and polished on the palate, with a sappy
and tangible substance. Good grip and acidity coming through here, so there is
still plenty of bite and structure to it, but it is the finely polished texture
I find here that really draws me to this wine. Released in November 2010. 17/20
![]()
François Chidaine Vouvray Clos Baudoin 2009: A south-facing site, 3 hectares
in size, with clay over limestone or tuffeau as it is known locally. This
has a very restrained style, more of a stony feel to the nose, with little fruit
expression. Certainly a very reserved character. Very dry and polished on entry,
showing a lot of structure underneath here, and a grippy and powerful
composition. Light fruit character like the nose, more of a liquid stone feel to
it, very reserved but with a super substance to it, this is one for the cellar.
Released in November 2010. 17.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Bournais 2009: Whether this cuvée is
dry or sweet depends on the vintage. The vines are 15 years old, and François
described the terroir here as more like Vouvray, without flint. In 2009
it shows a wonderful minerality on the nose, all crumbly volcanic rocks; this is
very expressive. It has a lovely minerality here, a softer texture than 2008 and
2007, but still with a wonderfully vibrant acidity and minerality. This is definitely one
of the better sec cuvées from François Chidaine in this vintage. It has
an almost soapy character, but I still really like it. This should be great. 18/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Bournais Franc de Pied 2009:
The same vineyard, but from a small selection of ungrafted vines which were
first bottled as an independent cuvée in 2007. That vintage there were about 500
bottles, there are 800 in 2009. It became apparent as they planted the vines
that this was an old parcel, as they found old vine roots in the soil, although
none of the locals remember it being cultivated. The soils are clay with thin
limestone. There are 2.5 hectares planted, with potential for 4 hectares in
total. This has a lovely style, quite ethereal and lifted, on the palate very
polished and substantial, but still with a fine acidity coming through. There is
no analysis for residual sugar at present. The quality is very close, but this
does seem to have a touch more substance and grip than the grafted version. An
impressive wine. 18/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Choisilles 2009:
Whether this cuvée is dry or sweet depends on the vintage. Here it is certainly
less expressive than Les Bournais (either cuvée!), but still very appealing,
with a clean soap-stone minerality, and this very clean style comes through on
the palate which is very defined and linear, with clean edges. Note that there
is a lot of substance and texture within here, though, followed by piles of grip
at the finish. This is lovely. 18/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Clos Habert Demi-Sec 2009: The soils here are
limestone and clay, the vines 60-years old,
and the wine usually a demi-sec, with 12 g/l residual sugar in 2009. It
has a beautifully perfumed character on the nose, lightly honeyed fruit,
ethereal with nuances of acacia and beeswax. It is lifted and light-footed
nevertheless. Very supple and polished on the palate, with a good grip at its
core, showing lots of defining and freshening acidity, much-needed as this is a
richer style than the fabulous 2008. Very attractive and direct with lovely
fresh structure underneath. An impressive, cleansing finish and structure here
too. 17.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Tuffeaux 2009: This is a non-site specific
cuvée, taking fruit from across all sites, usually gently sec tendre to
demi-sec or thereabouts, in the 2009 vintage it is firmly demi-sec with 17
g/l residual sugar. The nose reflects the terroir here, although note
some fruit comes from more flinty soils! It has a very direct and straight-up
style on the nose, but on the palate it surprises with a very fleshy, polished,
honeyed, yellow plum character. Beautifully broad and seductive on the palate,
with a very correct but elegant, well covered structure behind it all. This is
really impressive and suggestive of a slightly higher residual than that written
above. Beautifully balanced though. Excellent. 18/20
![]()
François Chidaine Vouvray Le Bouchet 2009: This cuvée is generally sweet,
demi-sec or moelleux, and is sourced from 50-year old vines on
clay-limestone terroirs; in 2009 it has 27 g/l residual sugar. Creamed
yellow fruit on the nose, definitely softer and more seductive on first
impression than some other 2009s. But there is a delightful minerality here too,
soft and lightly volcanic in its feel. The palate matches this, showing a very
sweet and honeyed character, with beautiful depth and breadth to it, but also
with a very fine core of laser-like acidity and lots of mineral grip. The finish
has a great, tangible substance. Superb wine. 18+/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Moelleux 2009:
A blend of all the Montlouis vineyards, made when the vintage suits it. In this
vintage the residual sugar comes in at 40 g/l. Not so expressive on the nose,
with just a very light suggestion of honeyed fruit. The palate is very
mellifluous, honeyed and flattering, with a sweet honeyed-crystalline character
to the fruit, before the crunchy minerality cuts though it on the midpalate.
Very appealing but this needs time to develop. Fine acid definition in the
finish and an embryonic botrytis character suggests there will be wonderful
development here. This should be very fine. 17.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Lys 2009: This is also a multi-site
assemblage, made only in selected vintages - the last outing for this
cuvée was in 2003. The residual sugar is 105 g/l. There are 1000 bottles. It has
a deep, concentrated, golden style of fruit here, yet it remains light and ethereal. Again
it does not seem so expressive. What the palate shows is a very broad depth of sweet and honeyed
fruit, with a very broad, very concentrated style, certainly complex,
with a good depth of structure from the botrytis. The acidity is there but this takes
a back seat, although I think given time the crystalline structure of the fruit
and the tangible grip will provide the necessary backbone. Impressive, but I
don't find it to be streets ahead of the moelleux. 18/20
![]()
François Chidaine Vouvray Moelleux 2009: This is an assemblage
from several sites, and this is its first vintage; François says it is not yet
named - a statement that would seem to place it alongside Les Lys. The residual
sugar of 135 g/l would seem to support this conclusion. There are just 500
bottles. Rather a feminine, perfumed minerality on the nose, although like the
Montlouis wines not that expressive. Has some golden fruit character alongside
this, But on the palate a very broad style, honeyed, with appealing minerality,
balanced acidity, with a very defined finish and good length. Very good evolving
golden-crystalline elements. 17.5+/20
![]()
I have left these two vintages, now nicely settled into bottle, in the order of tasting rather than separating out according to vintage. This should give some indication of how residual sugar ascends across the two appellations, and how the same cuvée (for Les Choisilles, Les Bournais and Le Bouchet) differs in the two vintages in terms of sweetness.
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Choisilles 2007: This cuvée usually includes
fruit from Clos Renard and Les Epinais when the vintage does not favour the
production of a moelleux. The vines are 30 to 90 years of age. Here I'm
told the residual sugar is 3 g/l although I note that contradicts information
provided last year. It is very expressive on the nose, with a good minerality to
it, chalky-stony with a good lemony bite. There is that light honeyed-acacia
note coming in here too. Despite this it is very firm and structured on the
palate, with lots of grip and acid giving it a very certain bite, very dry, with
lots of stony fruit with tinges of plum and lemon zest. Lots of minerality too.
This is good, although perhaps just a little on the austere side. 17/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Bournais 2007: A clay-limestone terroir here, hence bournais,
a name for this type of stone. This terroir is less common in Chidaine's
portfolio than clay-flint. Whether this cuvée is dry or sweet depends on the
vintage; it has 4.8 g/l in 2007. Quite a perfumed style on the
nose, with a gentle and feminine character to it, and a rather soapstone note as well. Rather a light feel to the palate, lots of acidity here, and a less
minerally character than Les Choisilles. Dry, structured, very correct, again challenging in its structure.
A big show of lemony substance on the drying, sappy finish. Good but
very forthright. 17/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Choisilles 2008: This cuvée usually includes
fruit from Clos Renard and Les Epinais when the vintage does not favour the
production of a moelleux cuvée. The residual sugar is 6 g/l. A perfumed
and lightly mineral style on the nose, with a chalky-lemony minerality. Good
substance here, a little more flesh on the palate than the 2007. Good structure,
very sappy and dry in the middle despite that fleshy start, with lots of acidity
and minerality. Again quite a firmly structured, austere and challenging
presence on the palate, with a firm stony finish. Very good. 17/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Bournais 2008:
Whether this cuvée is dry or sweet depends on the vintage; as in 2007 it is
towards the drier end although I do sense a little residual sugar here I think -
although it is revealed to be just 3 g/l! Very open and expressive on the nose, with light stony fruit, stylish
and seemingly more composed than some of the preceding wines. The palate seems
to confirm this as there is a greater cushion of texture here to sit around the
acidity and minerality. This is certainly my favourite of the four secs
first poured. 17.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Bournais Franc de Pied 2008:
The same vineyard, but from a small selection of ungrafted vines. This seems
just that little bit brighter and more open than the grafted cuvée. It has an
appealing substance, very stylish and polished, still with a stony substance to
it but with character and a good sense of balance. In the finish there is a good
structured polish to it. A very dry character again though. This cuvée just has
the edge I think but it is very close - I certainly wouldn't like to separate
them tasted blind! 17.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Tuffeaux 2007: This is a non-site specific
cuvée, taking fruit from across all sites, usually gently sec tendre to
demi-sec or thereabouts. The vines are 30 to 90 years old, the yield 43
hl/ha. In this vintage it is more demi-sec at 14.9 g/l residual
sugar. All of a sudden the expression changes here, this wine is certainly more
elegant, more polished, perfumed, floral and mineral. It has a lovely presence
on the palate, supple and stylish, but still with a very defining minerality
over the acidity coming through in the middle. Very appealing, still very long
and aggressively structured and mineral though. 17/20
![]()
François Chidaine Vouvray Le Bouchet 2007: This cuvée is generally sweet,
demi-sec or moelleux, and is sourced from 50 year-old vines on
clay-limestone terroirs. I'm told it has 18 g/l residual sugar, although
the figure provided last year was 15.8 g/l. Whichever it is it has a beautiful
expression, showing a lightly honeyed character coming in over the minerality of
the stone and light fruit freshness. A beautiful style on the palate, softer and
more polished, still very stony and correct but here with a greater cushion from
the texture, relating to that residual. Very correct and polished, a wine with
lovely potential. 17.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Clos Habert Demi-Sec 2008: The soils here are
limestone and clay, situated next to Clos du Breuil, the vines 50 to 70-years old,
and the wine usually a demi-sec, with 15.5 g/l residual sugar here. It is
difficult to taste this and be objective; I know I have always rated it very
highly, and I have half a case in the cellar. It has a lovely honeyed style,
showing great purity and also sweetness and elegance. The palate is perfectly
balanced, sweet and honeyed, yet complex and minerally, but with a dried finish,
elegant and fresh. What can I say? This remains as wonderful as it always has
been. 18.5/20
![]()
François Chidaine Montlouis Les Tuffeaux 2008: This is a non-site specific
cuvée, taking fruit from across all sites, usually gently sec tendre to
demi-sec or thereabouts, in this vintage it is firmly demi-sec at
19 g/l residual sugar. A lovely purity here, on the nose a very mineral and
expressive style, although it is subtle and approachable, and on the palate it
has a very fine expression. Finely balanced, with great minerality too. Supple,
poised and defined though. Somewhat tighter and more reserved than the Clos
Habert. This is very good indeed. 18/20
![]()
François Chidaine Vouvray Le Bouchet 2008: This cuvée is generally sweet,
demi-sec or moelleux, and is sourced from 50-year old vines on
clay-limestone terroirs. In this vintage it has 19 g/l residual
sugar. Very fresh and open in terms of style, with a touch of aniseed and
liquorice here, also fennel maybe. It has a lovely style, soft and supple,
polished off with oak, although there is a fine substance and depth to it as
well. There are polished and golden-honey fruits, giving the wine a very supple
style, delicious and rather caressing. Underneath a fine core of acid.
Impressive. 18/20
![]()
