Home > Vintages and Regions > Bordeaux > Bordeaux 2007 > St Julien & Margaux

Bordeaux 2007: St Julien & Margaux

Moving south from St Estèphe and Pauillac we come to St Julien, where quality was not significantly different to these aforementioned communes. The story of 2007 continues here with no surprises. This is not quite true of the commune of Margaux though, although sadly I have to report that the quality here does not swing back towards something more desirable than that which we have found so far. Instead the opposite is true, as in this commune we find one of the most disappointing Bordeaux experiences available on the market today.

The Story so Far

Looking back at my previous encounters with the 2007 vintage, with relevance to St Julien first, there was little that was striking or memorable about this commune following the primeur tastings. Some wines were notably stronger than their peers, with Léoville-Poyferré and Léoville-Las-Cases putting in the two most convincing performances. At the UGC tasting at two years of age, freshly in bottle, the Poyferré and Barton divisions of the great Léoville vineyard both showed well (Las-Cases does not participate in UGC events) although I noted at the time that I thought neither were at the level of Pichon-Baron in Pauillac.

As for Margaux, I have vivid memories of the primeur tasting of these wines which, if I remember correctly, was hosted by Lascombes, as being a melee of lean, light and occasionally vegetal and green wines. Experiences since have been no less concerning. Although both Margaux herself and Palmer put on a good show, the rest of the Margaux flock made for a rather uninspiring collection of wines. At the UGC tasting two years ago I did wonder at first whether this hadn't all turned around, as the first few wines I tasted were unexpectedly good, but ultimately these turned out to be the exceptions rather than the rule. Margaux has always been a weak spot in this vintage.

St Julien: The Wines

Bordeaux 2007The 2007 vintage in St Julien is one that clearly separates the best terroirs from those slightly less favoured, the most dedicated estate managers (how much less evocative than vigneron that term is!) from those less obsessive. This is not an inherently 'bad' vintage, but it is one where hard work was required to get the best from what Mother Nature had decided to deliver upon the region. There are one or two gently attractive wines in this commune, with a little more substance than I would otherwise expect, as well as those lighter, cooler and more reticent wines which seem to speak more clearly of the difficulties of the growing season.

Fans of the St Julien commune will not be surprised to read that it was the Léoville trio that showed best, not an uncommon occurrence now that Léoville-Poyferré is performing at the level of the other two Léoville estates (this was not the case only twenty years ago). Léoville-Barton was one of my most favoured wines on the day (beyond the first growths), a wine at once bright and perfumed, and yet also with an appealing layer of flesh on the palate. Both Léoville-Las-Cases and Léoville-Poyferré offered a similar experience.

Otherwise, the wines of this commune are much of a muchness; very decent wines, which will be approachable and mature earlier than those of many other recent vintages, but which are sadly over-priced for the quality they offer compared with the likes of 2006 or 2008, never mind the truly 'great' vintages of the last decade.

Margaux: The Wines

Although there does seem to be a prevailing view that 2007 is a 'useful' vintage, in that it is not a great vintage but is of sufficient quality to serve at least the restaurant trade, and perhaps to drink while we wait for greater vintages to come around (putting aside the issue of prices for a moment), I would countenance that, although true to an extent, this is a generalisation to which there are the inevitable exceptions. There are some wines that are better than expected, and some that are much less convincing. And from a communal point of view, there is no doubt in my mind that Margaux is significantly weaker than the other left bank communes. These are not wines that can be gently described as light and attractive; this is a commune of potential disappointment, with a significant number of wines showing greener and more vegetal traits than found just a little to the north.

Other than a very decent wine from Château Margaux, and something approaching that from Palmer, there are few moments of true pleasure here. Other communes could sell well, if the prices were right, but I'm not so sure of that in this commune. The prices here would have to be very low to entice me. I think with that in mind, rather than highlighting this commune's successes and failures any further, I will let my tasting notes speak for themselves. (17/1/12)

St Julien & Margaux 2007: Tasting Notes

Tasted at the Institute of Masters of Wine tasting in November 2011. Click to locate stockists.

St Julien

Château Beychevelle 2007: A slightly meaty and stewed character to the fruit on the nose here, lacking the freshness and brightness of the vintage. The palate feels quite solid but there is a nice, bright style of fruit struggling to emerge through the midpalate. Rather stolid in terms of composition, there is a light chewiness to the texture of the wine, largely influenced by some rather meaty tannins coming in at the edges. The acidity is there, but it all feels a bit chewy and robust. This one will need time; nothing is particularly out of kilter - there is enough weight there for those tannins - so it could come good. 15/20

Château Branaire-Ducru 2007: A dark, blackberry crumble kind of nose, a mix of dark fruits, fairly ripe in terms of hue, with a buttery layer perhaps from the oak. Sweet and bright blackberries on the edge of ripeness here, I think this shows through rather well. A polished and elegant beginning on the palate, building a little to a midpalate which has a supple texture, moderate weight, and fairly bright acidity. In the finish it shows grip, structure and freshness. This seems to combine ripeness of fruit, bringing a light but crunchy sweetness, with a very convincing structure. I find that overall it is at least commendable. It should give some good pleasure given time. 15/20

Château Lagrange 2007: Rather a muted nose here, the fruit hidden behind the oak at present, although given a little time in the glass it does come out very nicely. It has an interesting, slightly gritty character, reminiscent of dark red fruits, cherries in particular. A supple start on the palate, one that seems much better composed than I expected considering the slight reticence of the nose. There is a supple style of fruit, the tannins give a good backbone, and the acidity is on the fresher side, and overall it all works together very well. There is a light texture to it but in the middle it is undeniably grippy and tense. A wine with certain promise. 15/20

Château Langoa-Barton 2007: Rather an open and enticing nose here, very expressive and full of dark fruits, crunchy in style but open and accessible. There is certainly an edge of sweetness to it too. The fruit style moves away from red here to black, with notes of blackcurrant and smoke. Rather cool and stony at first, then warming up a little but always maintaining that rather detached and firm feel, along with a layer of chewy fruit that forms over the top. This chewiness also applies to the tannins. There is also a little hint of perfume and chalk. Supple and stony rather than weighty. Attractive. 15.5/20

Château Léoville-Barton 2007: A very open, expressive and convincing nose here, perfumed and bright, with a direct style of fruit. Really very convincing and a leader within the appellation and vintage. Really well-formed fruits, defined and yet with substance and polish, with only the faintest hint of oak in the background. The palate seems as if it is from another vintage; the fruit is supple, the texture harmonious, and from within there emerges grainy tannins and a fine, bright acidity which give the wine lovely shape and definition. Rather dry in terms of texture but that's not a problem. It is grippy and youthful, with more of this grip showing in the finish. A really very convincing wine. 16.5/20

Château Léoville-Las-Cases 2007: A very impressive nose here, with dense fruit apparent, but it remains very expressive despite this weight and concentration. The fruit has a lightly exotic style to it, dark and concentrated but bright and very well defined. The palate has a very appealing texture, with a glossy weight to it, blended very harmoniously with a supple tannic backbone and a fresh acidity. This has a wonderfully earthy seam, savoury and fresh as well as dense. The finish is dry, leading into a long grip with a lightly chewy feel to it. Another very impressive wine for a difficult vintage. 16.5/20

Château Léoville-Poyferré 2007: There is smoke and cedar on the nose here, dark fruit with somewhat more meaty tones than that which I found in the Léoville-Barton. It is dark and a little sooty too. The palate seems supple and relaxed (whereas Léoville-Barton was more linear and tight) but there is still a very fine definition here, and it holds together very well, with the structural elements very nicely contained within the substance of the wine. A good weight to the finish. This is a very good effort indeed for the vintage. 16/20

Château Talbot 2007: There is the usual Talbot funk on the nose here, with notes of bacon and roasted meats, some smoky oak alongside perhaps, and overall although it sounds quite atypical I do in fact find this aromatic profile quite appealing. A soft palate, with chalky red fruits, redcurrants especially, with a very firm acidity not found in the grander wines of the appellation. This dominates the palate somewhat, and the wine takes on a rather astringent feel as a result, and this persists through into a rather biting finish. 14/20

Margaux

Château Brane-Cantenac 2007: I find rather a hot and smoky nose here, somewhat like burnt candle wax, charred and most probably a barrel-related aroma. The palate is lean, fresh, light, and with a little structure behind it. There is moderate acidity and some rather soft tannins, giving the palate a very light and undistinguished feel. It's not a very impressive wine. A short finish. 14/20

Château Dauzac 2007: Rather a sexy nose here, with gritty fruit and new-oak barrel aromas. It is flashy, smoky and potentially seems quite seductive. It is rather warm as well of course, and underneath all this dressing I think I sense a greenness to the fruit as well. The palate is supple and bears a better definition than I expected from the nose. There is a gritty sugar-coated sweetness to the fruits, with a soft and chalky feel to the red fruit character, with soft tannins and moderate acidity. This seems acceptable but nothing more striking than that. 14.5/20

Château Giscours 2007: This has a surprisingly open, soft, accessible fruit character here, with some perfumed evolution already. It has a light, chalky suggestion to it. Rather a stolid palate, it has some texture but not the fruit or interest to match. It seems a little dull in terms of form or definition. It feels rather shapeless, with smoky and vegetal notes alongside what structural elements I find. 14.5/20

Château d'Issan 2007: Dark, smoky, really rather matchsticky as well on the nose, I wonder if there is some reduction here? There are little elements of meat and game coming in as well. The palate is light and shows some bitter and rather hot fruit elements. It seems fiercely composed and a little astringent too, and there is some green fruit here, not just on the palate but, returning to the nose, aromatically as well. It feels soft in the finish. This wine lacks substance. 14/20

Château Lascombes 2007: Dark and rather chunky fruit here, with a lots of meaty, gamey elements coming in from behind. The palate doesn't have the weight the nose suggested. There is more texture here than in some other wines but it feels a little hollow when I look at the tannin that sits around this core of fruit, and which dominates in the finish. Is some of this tannin wood-derived? I suspect so, and it has not been entirely to the wine's benefit. Plenty of acidity here though. If the tannins fade there could be something here. 14.5/20

Château Margaux 2007: A really appealing nose here, full of black bean, green tea and olives, this wine has such an appealing and exotic perfume it is hard not to be sucked into the glass. This is why I love Margaux! The palate is very restrained and reserved, showing the softness that so many others show, but with a tannic seam running down the middle of it, and a bright acid backbone too. It has a supple character, but sits on the slightly firmer side of elegant integration, and as such although it seems remarkably convincing within the context of the commune it does not stand up so well to the first growths from further north in my opinion. 16.5/20

Château Marquis d'Alesme Becker 2007: A really gentle character on the nose, rather perfumed, with gentle tinges of violet, along with some maturing elements suggestive of undergrowth, autumn leaves, tobacco, indeed quite a few elements that suggest maturity, far more than I would expect for a wine of this age. The palate has a nice supple feel to it, softly formed over a very nice seam of tannin and rather firm acidity. The maturing characteristics from the nose don't come though here so much as they might have done, but that doesn't lessen their concern for me. I'm not convinced this will make old bones. 14/20

Château Marquis de Terme 2007: A lean and slightly vegetal twist to the fruit here, the green pepper elements very evident on the nose. The fruit is supple and gentle, and in that respect attractive, but there is a bitter grip underneath it. The fruit character here does at least move away from green and more into red, which is certainly a good thing. But I can't get past that stewed green element on the nose. 13.5/20

Château Palmer 2007: This was impressive during the primeurs, allowing for the difficulties of the vintage in this statement, and here it performs in a similar manner. It is beautifully perfumed, smoky, with crunchy fruit, aromatically very convincing, close to compelling in fact. The palate does not quite offer the definition found on the nose though, with a soft start slowly moving towards a more defined midpalate although it doesn't quite get there in my opinion. There is a lovely supple character and a gentleness to the fruit which appeals, and there is still something of a gap between this wine and the rest of the pack. 16/20

Château Prieuré-Lichine 2007: Dark, with warm fruit, and a touch of green peppercorn here too. This is certainly a very well composed wine aromatically, with good definition, although I can't help feeling I would prefer some different aromas to be so well defined, if you see what I mean. The palate is towards the leaner end of the spectrum although there is some substance here, and the fruit character has a slightly bright, sour, rhubarb-like tinge to it. Rather an astringent finish too, with firm acidity. 13.5/20

Château Rauzan-Gassies 2007: Some smoke-tinged fruit here, with an ill-defined fruit profile, suggestive of sweet red candy but it is difficult to discern anything more specific than that. The palate has an appealing composition though, stylish and not too substantial in terms of weight. It seems very appropriate for the vintage. It comes across better in the mouth than it did on the nose. There is actually some promise here, despite that rather dry and dusty finish. 14.5/20

Château Rauzan-Ségla 2007: I find dark fruits here, quite well defined unlike those in the Gassies, with scents of plum and damson skin with a fresh and bright style, quite distinctive for the commune which has not done well as a whole in this vintage. The palate is also fairly convincing, with a savoury polish to the midpalate, with a nice balance of acid and tannin. This is without doubt one of the better wines in this appellation, although to be fair the competition is not strong in this vintage. 15.5/20