Home > Vintages and Regions > Bordeaux > Bordeaux 1994 > Tasting, August 2011
Bordeaux 1994: Tasting, August 2011
It is - much to my surprise - now four years since I last took a look at 1994 Bordeaux, my most recent assessment of a selection of wines from this vintage having been in April 2007. Now, as the wines are fast approaching their 18th birthdays, it seems like a good time to check in on the vintage once again (before they all become eligible for my twenty-years-on tasting in 2014 I suppose).
I have already given a summary of the vintage in my Bordeaux 1994 vintage review, as well as indicating how the wines can generate polarising opinion, both there and in my previous tasting in 2007. In short, whereas the vintage certainly has its fans, it does have to be said that many (but not all, note) drinkers of Bordeaux find the wines austere and lacking 'fruit' or 'flesh', especially compared to the wines which typify the region today. Put the rather genteel wines of 1994 in the ring with the more powerful modern Bordeaux, all night-dark and rich in alcohol, steroid-pumped wines from years such as 2009 and 2010, and they would take a serious pasting.
So clearly 1994 is a very different sort of vintage to 2009 and 2010; think 2002 and 2008 (which is rather leaner and brighter in style than Parker's praise might suggest), if modern-day comparisons are what you are after. Does 'different' automatically mean 'lesser' though? I would argue not; just as the differences between 1994 and 2009 or 2010 are as clear as day, it is just as apparent to me that many tasters find exactly what they want in the wines of this vintage, namely charming aromatics with gentle textures and dry, savoury structures on the palate, perfect for dining and savouring at leisure. This is certainly not a vintage to be ignored by those seeking out these qualities.
A Watershed Vintage?
Looking back on 1994, nearly twenty years later, this ability to polarise is perhaps one of the most interesting features of the vintage. Dividing a group of Bordeaux drinkers into those who find pleasure in 1994, and those who do not, are there any generalisations we could make about the two groups? For example, do the fans of 1994 generally favour Bordeaux as it used to taste, the more dry and savoury wines of yesteryear, and do those who eschew it much prefer the sweeter, more alcoholic and mouth-filling wines of today, wines such as Cos d'Estournel and Troplong-Mondot, from 2009 or 2010? Are the fans of 1994 and older vintages the drinkers who prefer more acidity, minerality and challenging flavours in their wine, filling their cellars with wines from Larmandier-Bernier, López de Heredia and Thierry Puzelat? And those who prefer more modern, more flashy Bordeaux, are they also out shopping for turbo-charged high-point high-alcohol Châteauneuf du Pape? In other words, does enjoying 1994 Bordeaux mark you out as a member of the Anti-Flavour Wine Elite, to quote a disdainful term coined by Parker to describe drinkers who, giving my honest interpretation of his stance, essentially have different preferences in wine to those he holds?

Of course, the validity of a dichotomisation of the entire wines drinking population of the world based purely on whether they enjoy 1994 Bordeaux is wide open to criticism, but these questions are still worth mulling over I think. I suspect there is some truth in these thoughts, but I also acknowledge that palate preferences are much too complex to be grouped by such coarse features as sweetness or alcohol in a single region in just one vintage (or perhaps not?).
Perhaps more importantly though, I do think of 1994 as a watershed vintage, one which preceded the coming of the new Bordeaux, a sweeter and more fleshy wine which can still please (my palate anyway - I acknowledge others modern Bordeaux an anathema) but which, in the shape of certain St Estèphe and St Emilion properties, can perhaps also take on more grotesque forms. I have to confess, although I still enjoy modern Bordeaux, and indeed find some of the wines downright delicious, I do also hanker after the more savoury and less alcoholic wines that the region was rightly famous for just a few decades ago. The 1994 vintage, with its dry but fading tannic structure and perfumed aromas, certainly affords us a glimpse of this Bordeaux of old. And for that, I have no choice but to line myself up with the fans of 1994. (23/8/11)
Bordeaux 1994 - Tasting Notes
Tasted in August 2011. Click
to locate stockists.
Château de Fieuzal Blanc (Pessac-Léognan) 1994:
Strangely, although there are none of the tartrate crystals that I saw in my
last bottle, there is a really unusual brown, blobby deposit on the underside of
the cork. And without a doubt there is, before the wine relaxes and releases any
more interesting aromas, an undeniable seam of oxidation coming in here. The hue
is a firm lemon-gold and aromatically, alongside this papery-nutty element,
there are notes of orange fruit and dried driftwood. In terms of aroma and
flavour, it is a very 'brown' wine, showing papery nut, old wooden desks, with
tinges of dried toffee and walnut. There is still plenty of acid and structure
though, so this adds a frame to these rather evolved, oxygen-influenced
characteristics. All in all this is quite attractive, although whereas on one
hand I rather enjoy the challenging, savoury-sour aspects of it, on the other it
would be easy to right it off as oxidised and over-the-hill. But there are just
too many points of interest here for me to do that. 16/20
![]()
Domaine de Chevalier (Pessac-Léognan) 1994:
A lovely maturing hue here, with a mahogany tinge. The aromatics are very
reassuring, still with a youthful vibrancy even after seventeen years, with a
juniper berry freshness cut with hints of redcurrant and just-ripe blackberry,
and in layers o top of this hints of minerals, attractively bitter fruits, bay
leaf and smoke. The start on the palate is very cool and refined, well framed,
savoury and with mouth-watering acidity, It has the sort of structure and
crunchy fruit profile that would have lovers of modern Bordeaux running for the
hills. Through the midpalate this style remains apparent, giving a very clean
and clipped style, with a fresh and acid bound finish. It does have a certain
fullness to it though, as although this is no creamily-styled modern Bordeaux
there is certainly some substance here. In the finish, cranberry fruit, and all
the acid that berry usually carries. It certainly has a clean, well framed
substance. Overall, I like this, but it does have a lighter and more acidic
backbone in keeping with the traditional view of the vintage. 16/20
![]()
Château Haut-Bailly (Pessac-Léognan) 1994:
From a half-bottle. A dark, rather matt, maturing hue. Aromatically this has a
lot of instant appeal, although it needs a couple of hours in the decanter to
really get going. There is a fresh violet-tinged perfume, with a chalky
red-fruit tinge, and it is also showing notes of stone and seashell. This is
still exhibiting a youthful, fresh-fruit character on the palate, with a gentle
but undeniable seam of softening tannin and fresh acidity. The texture reflects
the vintage, stony and firm, but with a restrained flesh, and the perfume is
certainly quite delightful. A lovely, slightly sappy style here, with a long,
fresh finish. Overall this has real charm and even some delicacy; I really like
this wine. 17/20
![]()
Château Cos d'Estournel (St
Estèphe) 1994:
This has a moderately dense hue, showing some maturity. The nose is remarkably
perfumed, with a glorious roasted St Estèphe character, lightly gamey although
this lies behind a complex and quite forceful melange of aromas, nuances of
gravel and stones, clay too, and a rich, organic aroma suggestive of dark tea
leaves, green olives and juniper berries, or perhaps a mix of them all. It has a
firm and serious, very savoury character, dense with nothing sweet or soft or
fruity about it. This is classic old-school Bordeaux, and gives plenty of
olfactory joy. It has a really good presence on entry, and although it doesn't
have the grand and flattering flesh of warmer and more favourable vintages there
is without doubt a great substance here. There is a really grippy and savoury
character which pervades on the palate, and the structure is very fine, with
lovely and ripe if rather gritty tannin, and fresh acidity. And in the finish, a
long and dry, stern and savoury character, with nuances of dry bitterness
reminiscent of coffee-ground astringency. Really lovely, transcending the
low-level reputation of the vintage. I'm sorry this is my last bottle! 18/20
![]()
Château
Haut-Bages-Libéral (Pauillac) 1994: Showing maturity here in appearance
at least, a dark and solid core, but with a wide and dusty rim which shows a red
hue with a touch of brick. The nose is certainly perfumed, showing a violetty
floral twist to the gentle cedary aromatics, which also has some deeper
characteristics than previously noted, including dark liquorice with burnt,
smoky overtones, and savoury suggestions of black olive. There's also something
slightly green and complex, like angelica or even green pepper but it is subtle
and I find it appealing. The palate still shows a rather angular substance which
is why this vintage comes in for such criticism from some quarters, but it has
certainly softened. There is perhaps a little more kick to it through the middle
and towards the end, and although I sense more evolution in terms of flavour I
wonder if the structure won't fall apart before this gets anywhere. Attractive,
with a nice little hint of sweetness in the end. All the same, if I had any more
I would drink sooner rather than later I think. 15.5/20
![]()
Château Haut-Batailley (Pauillac) 1994:
This takes an hour or so to really open up in the decanter, shifting from its
initially hard and withdrawn state to a much more harmonious one. A maturing
oxblood hue with a fading, brick red rim. The nose relaxes into a perfumed,
meaty fruit character, dense seemingly iron-bound fruit with fleeting nuances of
violets and roasted meats, although with time the floral element does seem to
gain more prominence. Softly textured at first, elegant, then showing a more
chalky substance through the middle, and still revealing a rather hard, austere,
iron-bound structure, with a degree of phenolic bitterness. I find increasing
softness and texture with a little more time in the glass though, backed up by
firm grip and acidity. This could drink very well for many years with this
degree of backbone. Appealing wine. 16.5/20
![]()
Château Pontet-Canet (Pauillac) 1994:
As usual an attractively dark hue in the glass, still tending towards red in
colour rather than anything overtly mature. It doesn't take long to open up,
less than an hour in the decanter, and it starts to show maturing aromas of
aromatic black tea leaves alongside the notes of black olives, green peppercorn
and mint. In fact it shows in a fashion very similar to my note from late 2010.
The palate has only a moderate weight in keeping with the vintage, which can
show beautiful classicism but rarely a great deal of flesh. The structure of the
wine follows this rule, with a dry tannic bite. Good acids, altogether bright
and composed, but with the usual challenging composition. This works very well
now with roast beef or similar, but it still needs time for this tannic backbone
to resolve completely. No rush here. 17/20
![]()
Château Léoville-Las-Cases (St Julien) 1994:
This wine shows an undeniable tinge of maturity as it hits the decanter, but at
its core there is plenty of red pigment. It isn't the most expressive wine on
the nose at first, and despite remaining in contact with the air for several
hours it doesn't really develop in this respect. There is a little dark and
smoky-dusty fruit, with subtle elements of seashell and black olive behind. Its
character on the palate reflects this rather reserved and stolid character on
the nose, as it shows a fine structure with a good weight and sweet, dusty
tannins combined with nuanced notes of violets and a gentle perfume of tea leaf.
Supple, with an overt structure although it is balanced by a gentle, sinewy
flesh, And in the finish, just a little trace of muscly tannin. Attractive, a
very good claret for roast beef or similar I think. Ready, but no rush; I
suspect this will be good for ten years yet, and probably much longer than that.
17/20
![]()
Château Léoville-Barton
(St Julien) 1994: A deeply coloured wine, giving no suggestion that this
might be regarded as a 'lesser' vintage. And in terms of age it shows a little
bricking around the rim. but it still has a rich core of red-black fruit. With a
couple of hours in the decanter this really opens out, revealing a perfumed
maturing Cabernet Sauvignon nose, full of violets, savoury and thick-skinned
black fruits, with a dusty edge bringing the richness of black olives crushed
with chalk, and sprinkled with a little freshly-picked mint. A nice flesh at the
start, as I have found on previous assessments of this wine, and this tangible
substance persists through the middle, where it underpins flavours of cigar box
and lightly roasted fruit. The tannins provide a firm backbone and although very
upright they are in no way dry or green. The flesh apparent here continues
through to the end of the wine, which lingers nicely. Overall this is a very
appealing, classically styled wine which still has years and years ahead of it.
17.5/20
![]()
Château Léoville-Poyferré (St Julien) 1994:
This has a remarkable dense hue, with an obviously evolved, mahogany hue despite
the near-opaque appearance. The nose has a fine aromatic quality, rich in
balsamic tones, very evolved but also bright and forceful. It is also very clean
- should the term balsamic suggest something vinegary let me be clear this is
not so - there is nothing acetic here. Instead we have sweet perfumed black
fruits, overlaid with dark liquorice with an angelica sweetness, moving into a
richness that even suggests treacle toffee sprinkled with burnt raspberries.
Aromatically, it is enticing and convincing. It is on the palate that the
character of the vintage shows, the balsamic and liquorice fruit, mixed here
with graphite, stone, black olive and tar, carried along within a surprisingly
lean texture. For my palate it works well, and I like the precise edge of the
texture in combination with that very savoury fruit profile, but many drinkers
of modern Bordeaux may wonder where the flesh and sweetness is. This all flows
through the palate very well, accepting this edgy texture, and towards the end
it does indeed show a richer body, and there is a little length as well,
although always with that crunchy, crushed, fruit-skin feel to it. The tannins
show a little in the finish too, adding just a little sharpness, but otherwise
this seems perfectly integrated now. Delicious. Drinking well, although it will
keep for some time yet. 17.5/20
![]()
Château Troplong-Mondot (St Emilion) 1994:
A good colour here, dark concentrated and with a mature rim. The nose is really
enticing, starting off with some delightfully perfumed fruit redolent of violets
dusted with soot, before developing a savoury, evolved, spiced fruit character.
It is exquisitely expressive and certainly full of appeal. After an hour or two
of exposure to air in the decanter the palate shows an appealing substance,
restrained rather than fleshy, but certainly not lean or aggressive. It is
supple and yet rather detached, with a really good grip behind the perfumed
fruit here. The tannins are fading but still give a fine backbone, the finish
slightly dry and dense, and quite long. Classically restrained, fresh but with
appropriate acidity, and yet with a gentle caress to it providing a sense of
harmony rather than anything more sharp. I still really like this. And it has
just 13% alcohol! 17/20
![]()
Vieux Château Certan (Pomerol) 1994:
An elegant hue, slowly fading out to a mature rim. A fine nose which takes a
good few hours to open up, revealing an aromatic perfume as it does so. Mature
macerated fruit, baked forest fruits and berries, with elements of soot giving
way to notes of black tea leaves and freshly-milled flour. Supple and with
appealing flesh on the palate, showing just a touch more density than some of
the other wines tasted here, although the Troplong-Mondot gives it a strong run
for its money. This softness soon yields though to a more powerful sense of
spice and grip, the wine revealing through the midpalate a sense of urgency, a
vigour and energy which powers the wine through the midpalate. There is, behind
it all, a sense of polished but peppery fruit waiting in the wings, and in the
finish there is a definite twist of spicy tannin and grip. This is a wine which,
while showing an admittedly substantial readiness through the middle, clearly
states in the finish that it has more to give. Sadly, this is my only bottle. My
major criticism is lack of mature perfume or complexity; it seems elegant,
composed, and this wine deserves credit for that, but there doesn't seem to be
the extra layer that we should find at the quality level. All the same,
certainly a wine that gives pleasure. 17/20
![]()
Château Coutet (Barsac) 1994:
Only a mid-golden hue here, certainly not a colour suggesting great
concentration or mature complexity. The nose starts off rather tame, showing a
little smoky fruit and also a little matchsticky note; this latter element
largely blows off, although the wine never really shakes off a slightly
volatile, painty aroma alongside the fruit. Nicely textured on the start of the
palate, rather fresh, still with that matchsticky element here, but also the
suggestion of something smoky, and a hint of volcanic minerality. Sweet, gently
composed, with yellow pastille fruit. It has rather an anonymous finish. Quickly
fades, seems rather muted at this point. Overall this is certainly not a great
example of Coutet, but it was not a vintage that favoured the wines of Sauternes
and Barsac. 15/20
![]()
