Home > Vintages and Regions > Other Fine Wines > Champagne: Odd Bottles
Champagne: Odd Bottles
Non-vintage
wines include an approximate purchase date before the date of tasting or consumption. Where there is no purchase date, the wine was that on
current release. I have ordered the notes by vintage, followed by the
non-vintage wines. Click
to locate stockists.
Leclerc-Mondet Brut 2000: A fairly rich and vibrant hue, and a
moderately size bead, quite vigorous at first, which settles down to something
more lazy with time in the glass. The nose is very appley, with an aromatic,
baked apple quality, with a gentle, nutty nuance on the side. Soft and creamy on
the palate at entry, with a firmer quality through the midpalate, with a baked,
roasted flavour too, and a gentle mousse, this is good. Towards the finish it
shows more structure, with a firmer acidity apparent here, and I think that
although approachable now this would improve over a year or two in the cellar.
16+/20 (December 2009)
![]()
H. Blin & Co. Brut 1996: Here's a real bargain with no
lack of quality. A good colour in the glass, with a strong bead. An exuberant
nose when served at cellar temperature - full of creamy white fruits, nuts and
yeast. A similar richness is present on the palate, a developed yeast
and nut character, with a creamy mouthfilling richness, all
backed up by correct acidity. Extraordinarily drinkable.
16/20 (January 2003)
![]()
Moët et Chandon Cuvée Dom Perignon 1995: Very pale in appearance. A
sparse bead with moderate sized bubbles. It remains quite restrained on the
nose, with mere hints of aromas that typify youthful Dom Perignon – a mixture of
almonds, cream and white fruits. The palate maintains this reserved, closed-down
theme, as it remains very tight. Much more grip and acidity than fruit or
flavour at present, but there is a fine mousse. This is a great wine in the
making and I look forward to opening the remaining bottles in the distant
future. Hold for three to five years minimum. 18+/20 (October 2003)
![]()
Jacquart Brut Mosaïque 1992: Lemon gold in colour, with a powerful
mousse, this is a vibrant and easily enjoyed wine. There are some toasty and
smoky nuances on the nose, cutting through a thick seam of white fruit. On the
palate the unsurprisingly fresh and persistent yet soft and silky mousse
provides plenty of interest. There is plenty of fruit, with a rich, creamy,
complex and savoury edge, and great acidity. It finishes with some finesse. I
enjoyed this wine most when it had been open for an hour or two, the mousse had
settled and the complex flavours were showing. This wine has the necessary
structure for ageing, but is still enjoyable now. 16.5/20 (November 2001)
![]()
Jacquart Brut Blanc de Blancs 1992: Rich, yellow-golden colour. A change on the nose since last
tasted, with more obvious maturity. Complex aromas of coffee, marzipan.
Creamy, mouthfilling texture and mousse. A tropical note to the fruit, with
toffee and coffee character. The previously obvious acidity, something that I
have found to mark the 1992 vintage, has lessened and the wine has nice
balance as a result. Creamy, complex finish. Ready now, but should drink for
another three to five years. 16.5/20 (July 2003)
![]()
Moët et Chandon Cuvée Dom Pérignon 1992: A mid golden hue to this
wine, with a very subtle bead. The nose conjures up images of almonds swirled in
cream, with a backdrop of yeasty, home-baked biscuit aromas. As the bead would
suggest, a soft yet persistent mousse on the palate. Very nicely poised, well
balanced, with the required acidity maintaining a good presence throughout,
supporting quite a creamy, medium-bodied texture. An almost sour-savoury finish
leading into a good length. Potential for some further development. 17+/20 (July
2001)
![]()
Massé Albert Etienne 1990: A lemon-gold hue, with a fine bead. Nice
mineral quality to the nose. With time developed some
biscuity, yeasty notes, and hints of peach. A soft
mousse. Good creamy texture, rich fruit, citrus acidity.
Quite good, until the finish which seems a little
astringent, bitter even, marring the overall impression.
14.5/20 (August 2000)
Retaste: Gorgeous nose, which has developed
coffee and nut complexity. Good texture, creamy but light
rather than rich, and well balanced. No problems with the
finish this time. 15/20 (March 2001)
![]()
Mumm Grand Cordon 1990: Lemon gold, with a prominent bead which
rapidly fades. Interesting nose of marzipan, pistachio
nuts, and a hint of oxidation. The mousse is very alive
on the palate. Light yet creamy texture, with oysters and
nuts. Sharp finish, with a pleasing although slightly
astringent length. At the time of writing available for £25 at a variety
of retail outlets. Usual price £50, at which it would represent poor
value. 16/20 (January 2001)
![]()
Mumm Cordon Rouge Cuvée Limitée Brut 1990:
A pale colour doesn't suggest an overly rich wine, and
indeed it isn't. Lemony fruit on the nose, with some
yeasty, doughy notes. A quite finely balanced palate,
with fresh, lifting acidity, this being the wines most
attractive characteristic. It balances out the autolytic,
biscuity, yeasty complexities quite well. 15.5/20 (January 2001)
![]()
Piper Heidsieck 1990: A rich lemon-gold colour,
with a fine but energetic bead. Plenty of sweet, baked
apples and yeasty, doughy aromas on the nose. On the
palate, a fine yet sharp mousse is immediately apparent.
There is plenty of flavour, with a slightly sour, acidic
apple profile offset with a slightly creamy richness,
which builds as the wine sits on the palate.
Nevertheless, the acidity persists through the endpalate,
cutting through this richness, providing a slightly
astringent finish. It all suggests that this wine would
be better for a few more years in the cellar. 16/20 (July 2001)
![]()
Billecart-Salmon Brut Réserve NV: Purchasd Autumn 2002. A pale golden yellow, with a very fine bead.
Fairly delicate on the nose, with floral hints and a subtle, bready note. More
showy on the palate, with a full body and good, creamy mousse, although quite
foamy, with a somewhat sherbetty edge which I always find distracting. Strong
acidity. Little complexity to the acidic, citrus fruits. Another that would
benefit from six or more months in the cellar. 16/20 (January 2003)
![]()
F Bonnet Brut Heritage NV: Purchased Autumn 1999. A pale golden colour. Fresh
citrus fruits on the nose, with bready notes. Moderate,
fairly elegant mousse. Fresh citrus flavours follow on
from the nose, with appropriate acidity, but more buttery
and yeasty notes evident towards the end-palate. A clean
finish. Good drinking. 15.5/20 (August 2000)
![]()
Raymond Boulard Brut Tradition NV: A golden yellow colour, but
with a hint of copper, and a fine bead. On the nose,
freshly peeled Gala apples, and a nose full of biscuity,
yeasty autolytic aromas. A gentle but fresh mousse, with
a strong backbone of acidity. Nuts, cream and apple
flavours, and more autolytic notes. Quite a rustic
mouthfeel. Enjoyable wine, but perhaps another six months
in bottle might soften that acidity. 16/20 (August 2001)
![]()
Canard-Duchêne Brut NV: Purchased Summer 2000. Attractive lemon-gold, with
a fairly coarse bead. The nose is initially mineral and
white citrus fruit, but it quickly develops bready,
leesy, yeasty notes. The palate has a sharp mousse, fresh
acidity, mineral notes, is also quite bready. Finishes
with a creamy touch. A good NV, with a hint of elegance
on the nose. 14.5/20 (August 2000)
![]()
Canard-Duchêne Charles VII Brut Grande Cuvée NV: Purchased
Spring 2000. The wine has a lemon-gold hue and a fine
bead. The nose is lead by a delicious yeasty, autolytic
aroma. Behind this there is a fresh, lemony fruit aroma,
with a slightly herbaceous element. A lovely mousse on
the palate, which quickly fades to leave a delightful,
creamily textured wine coating your mouth. There is good
lemony acidity to balance this richness, and that yeasty
flavour is also there. Slips down beautifully, with good
length. 16.5/20 (May 2000)
Retaste: Purchased Spring 2000. A nose of citrus fruits at first, but
aromas of coffee and toast signify some development here. Similar flavours on
the palate, moderately rich, good acidity. Improved. 16.5/20 (May 2001)
![]()
Cattier Premier Cru Brut NV: Purchased Winter 2004. Quite a pale hue
with a sparse but fine bead. The nose is a little yeasty and also a little
cheesy, perhaps reflecting the blend which is 35% PM and 40% PN with only 25%
Chardonnay. Similar character on the palate, which seems nicely evolved in terms
of interesting flavour, but doesn't have the weight to match. So a little on the
lean side, with firm, correct acidity and a nice fresh mousse. I've a feeling it
may develop with bottle age. Good at the price I paid - about £12. 15.5+/20 (January 2005)
![]()
Louis Chaurey Brut NV: A pale
yellow-straw and a fairly fine-moderate bead, and plenty of it too. Good
freshness and lively character on the nose, lemon sherbet, peach skin and a
rather exuberant, volcanic minerality. A nice substance on the palate, fresh and
with lots of tangible citrussy acidity. It has that sense of broad chalkiness to
the body that you sometimes get in the sparkling wines of Saumur rather than
Champagne. A nicely complete style within this context, certainly fresh and it
would make a good aperitif. 15.5/20
(March 2010)
![]()
Comte Audoin de Dampierre Grande Cuvée Brut NV: I rather liked the
Comte Audoin wines when tasted at the
CIB tasting earlier this year, and found
the man himself to be charming, as is this wine. It has an appealing partridge eye
appearance from skin contact, with a fine bead. An aromatic style, broad and
complex, showing some maturity, and certainly an interesting style. Fresh, full,
creamy, yet gentle and balanced on the palate. Fine, persistent, really very
delicately poised. Quite complex and certainly an impressive and good value NV
cuvée. 17.5/20 (July 2007)
![]()
Comte de Lantage Grand Cru NV: A good
straw-gold hue as found when last tasted, and also as noted previously a very
memorable and evocative nose, with polished, broad, honey-tinged fruit, still
with a nutty, bready note, but also a touch of baked apple as well. Beautifully
defined palate, rich and quite well structured, plenty of depth, fresh and
vibrant, with good acidity buoying up and framing the flesh of the wine. There
is a fine and yet vigorous mousse too. Fresh, interesting and full of flavour,
with dried fruits tinged with baklawa. Delicious. Bottled by Michèle et Alain
Mandois, Cerseuil, NM 494-001. 17/20
(March 2010)
![]()
Drappier Carte d'Or Rosé NV: This has a very appealing pink, onion skin
hue, with a good bead plainly evident. The nose carries aromas of strawberry leaf
with hints of cream and biscuit. On the palate there is plenty of fruit, with a fresh, textured, creamy
composition. A dry and well presented mousse. Overall a developed and very
appealing style. Very good. 16.5+/20 (June 2008)
![]()
Drappier Rosé Leger Brut NV: A fabulous hue here, pale with a faint,
onion-skin tinge, and with a fine but plentiful bead. Fine purity but also good
expression on the nose, a very creamed fruit character, with an appealing
freshness, a tinge of mintiness, and a chalky-crumbly minerality. Correctly
fresh on the start of the palate, with lots of life and vigour, mint-tinged and
very full Pinot fruit with firmer minerality coming through in the end of the
wine. A good flavoursome character and a nice, broad, fruit-filled substance,
but balanced and poised despite the fruit richness. Very appealing and fresh,
and yet impressively textured too. Delicious. 17/20 (February 2011)
![]()
Heidsieck & Co. Monopole Blue Top Brut NV: Purchased
Summer 2000. An attractive
light onion-skin colour. Fairly coarse bead. The nose
carries a light yeastiness together with some citrus
fruit. A middle of the road palate, with more subtle
biscuity yeasty notes sitting with sharp citrus fruit
acidity. Mousse is a little aggressive. Pleasant
drinking. 14/20 (September 2000)
![]()
Jacquart Brut Blanc de Noirs NV:
It's a long time since I've tasted anything from the Jacquart co-operative. This
wine has a pale straw hue and an amazingly bountiful bead in the glass. On the
nose it begins to display its Pinot character, with a lightly-baked, oaty
biscuit character on the nose, brightened by a streak of lemon and thyme running
through it. It seems very nicely defined here, although it is less so on the
palate, immediately displaying a rather fatter character from the start right
through the middle, a little loose-knit and easy-going, perhaps in part relating
to the dosage. Nevertheless, it is
still full of opulent, juicy character that brings some pleasure, even if it
feels dilute. It has that biscuit edge and certainly some honeycomb praline,
with a plump mouthfeel and flavour impact of a blanc de
noirs even though it doesn't seem to have the structural weight, showing
just a touch lighter and more delicate in terms of composition than I might have
expected. But that's too much criticism; there is good flavour here, with some
appealing blackcurrant notes coming through very strongly in the midpalate, and
then showing an almost grippy, savoury, damson-skin character on the finish. A
non-wino crowd-pleaser, but nothing more serious than that. 15/20
(August 2010)
![]()
Jacquart Brut Tradition NV: A pleasing
pale yellow hue, with reasonably fine bead. Good yeast-edged
lemony fruit on the nose. Nice texture on entry, cream-edged
mousse, and correct acidity. Not a complex Champagne, but great
for supping by the bucket-load over the festive season. And a wonderful price
too. 15.5/20 (December 2002)
![]()
Janisson & Fils Brut Premier Cru NV: Janisson & Fils are based in the
grand cru village of Verzenay on the Montagne de Reims; other than that, I know
little of this grower. The wine has a fresh mid-gold hue, and a plentiful bead
of moderate size. The nose initially seems quite primary, with citrus fruits
laid over a smoky and stony character, very clean, defined and fresh, with
little hints of praline. The palate has a broad presence, and is just dripping
with lightly crunchy golden fruits, clean and with plenty of zip. The mousse is
fine, the acidity full on, both giving it plenty of lift, but what I think I
enjoy most is the layer of golden-crunchy fruits, like crushing and popping
golden grapes between your teeth. Rather dry in the finish, more so than
expected, and showing a touch of steel here. 16/20 (November 2010)
![]()
Janisson & Fils Brut Rosé NV: This is
a Pinot-rich blend, with 80% Pinot Noir and the balancing 20% entirely
Chardonnay. In the glass it has an appealing salmon-sunset pink hue and a
fine-to-moderate bead. Rich fruit on the nose, lightly biscuity-strawberry, with
a touch of praline, and on the palate a creamy texture backed up by a pleasing
acidic backbone and a crisp fine mousse. There is a good depth of fruit here,
quite dark in character, with little notes of blackcurrant leaf, black pepper
and black truffle too along the way, culminating in a very harmonious finish. It
has quite a lot of substance in the mouth, reflecting the Pinot dominance,
overall presenting a big mouth-filling style, with a slightly bitter grip, but
still nicely poised and very easy to drink. 16.5/20
(September 2010)
![]()
Charles Lafitte Grande Cuvée Brut NV: Purchased Summer 2000.
A very pale lemon
colour, but with an attractive, quite fine bead. Sharp,
lemony, pithy citrus fruit nose, with little yeasty
complexity. On the palate, quite a sharp mousse, although
this fades with time. The acidity is also quite sharp,
and thus this wine was best with food. Lemon, mineral,
citrus fruit flavours. Clean finish, but no length.
14/20 (August 2000)
![]()
Laurent Perrier Cuvée Rosé Brut NV:
Purchased Summer 2002. Lovely colour, a vibrant
pink, with a salmon-tinged edge. Good bead. Plenty of strawberry fruit and
brioche on the nose. A full bodied palate, rich with a creamy edge and full mousse.
Plenty of flavour, and good acidity. Delightful.
16.5/20 (August 2002)
![]()
Laurent Perrier Grand Siecle 'La Cuvée' NV: Purchased Summer
2003. I suspect it is the 95/93/90 blend. Good colour. A nose of
almonds and cream, swirled with lemon juice, over a layer of brioche. Lovely,
full, creamy and quite svelte palate, with a biting mousse. Very backward and
youthful at present, with firm acidity which dominates a little. A very good
length too. Great finesse here, but it is still just a baby. Needs 5-10 years in
the cellar. 17+/20 (September 2004)
![]()
Moët et Chandon Brut Impérial NV: Purchased Summer 2000. A pale golden
hue. The nose carries pithy citrus fruits, with
background nuances of butter and bready yeasts, which
become more prominent with aeration. A sharp, acidic
mousse, although this also settles with time. Fairly
rich, with good leesy complexity. Clean citrus finish.
15/20 (August 2000)
![]()
Moutardier Brut Sélection NV: Moutardier are based in Le Breuil south
of the Marne, and specialise in Pinot Meunier (which accounts for 80% of the
vineyard). This cuvée though is 50% each Pinot Noir and Chardonnay. It has a
rich colour, a polished pale-golden hue with a tinge of bronze at its very core.
And on the nose a style indicative of oxidative processes, the aromas doinated
by nutty-polished oak, baked-roasted citrus fruits, with a smoky-toasty-Maillard
coating and a hint of sweet whisky mash which - to my surprise - I find works
really well in this context. It is rich and full on the palate, broad and bold,
with notes of sweet candied lemons. There is plenty of fine and defined mousse,
giving a much needed bright and incisive character, helped by very firm acidity
and a rather sour edge to the fruit and acid character. This does at least give
it a sappy, savoury, lip-smacking finish, but I do confess I find the role of
the acidity a little dominant and incongruous for my palate. 14.5/20 (November
2010)
![]()
Mumm Cordon Rouge Brut NV: Purchased Spring 2002. Attractively packaged,
and the wine itself has an attractive colour and good
bead. The nose has considerable appeal, with warm brioche, lemony fruit, and a
suggestion of a developing nutty, marzipan element. The palate has fairly
aggressive acidity, with a somewhat sour character towards the finish, but some good fresh fruit and a toasty edge. Firm mousse.
Quite acceptable, particularly in this price bracket, and time in the bottle
will tame that acidity. 15/20 (April 2002)
![]()
Piper-Heidsieck Brut Rosé NV: Purchased Spring 1998. A gorgeous, deep
salmon-pink with a hint of orange. Redcurrants and
strawberries on the nose, with herbaceous notes, and
hints of yeasty bread. Good mousse on the palate, good
weight, attractive raspberry fruit. 16.5/20 (August 2000)
![]()
Piper-Heidsieck Rosé Sauvage Brut NV: The vibrant pink label of this
wine seems appropriate when you catch a glimpse of the wine itself, which this
one of the deepest, salmon-red hues I have ever seen in a rosé - getting towards
the redder hues we might expect from Larmandier-Bernier's Rosé de Saignée or
similar. And it is youthful, as evinced by the plentiful bead. There are lots of
plump red fruits on the nose, showing a sweet-sherbetty tinge. A rather full
style to the palate, bitter in terms of acid and grip, with a sour edge to the
fruit. Quite coarsely raw in terms of character, showing more bitter sherbet and
steel structure on the palate than flavour, right through to the finish. This
doesn't pull me back for more. 13.5/20 (February 2011)
![]()
Piper Heidsieck Cuvée Brut NV: A short and rather peremptory note, as
I tasted - or rather nursed over a period of an hour or two - a glass of the
latest non-vintage from Piper at a recent Champagne reception with none other
than Diana Rigg. She was charming, as you might imagine. This entry-level cuvée
wasn't bad either. Nicely delineated, very straightforward and honest. Fresh on
the palate, gentle in terms of mousse and acidity, nicely balanced, altogether
this is very good, and there is value here too. 16.5/20 (February 2008)
![]()
Piper-Heidsieck Cuvée Brut NV: Purchased Autumn 2002. A lemon-gold hue. Some rich fruit aromas on the nose,
with a smoky, brioche edge. Creamily textured on the palate, with firm mousse and sharp
acidity. Good fruit. Very fresh and a step up in quality for Piper-Heidsieck.
Would benefit from six-twelve months in the cellar.
16.5+/20 (January 2003)
![]()
