Home > Producer Profiles > Champagne Profiles > Pol Roger

Pol Roger

Pol Roger founded this eponymously named house in 1849, although it was not quite as we know it today. The house was named simply Roger, and Pol, who was the son of a notary and owned no vineyards at all, made his living largely by making Champagne for other houses. But when the thriving family business came to his sons, Maurice and Georges, in 1900, they honoured their father by changing their surname to Pol-Roger. And thus the family business also became Pol Roger. Maurice was very much the public face of the company, whereas Georges was much more active in the blending and tasting rooms.

Maurice Pol-Roger was a legendary figure in the history of Épernay and Champagne. His iconic status was assured when, as mayor of Épernay, he resisted the efforts of an invading German army to enter the town in 1914. The grateful townspeople continued to re-elect Pol-Roger as mayor until 1935 when, anxious that he may step down after so many years in post, they bestowed the honour upon him for life. But death comes even to mayors, and so in 1959 Pol Roger passed to Maurice's son, Jacques, and nephew, Guy. This partnership ran the firm until 1963 when the fourth generation, Christian Pol-Roger and Christian de Billy, took control. The two Christian's run the show still, with assistance from Hubert, son of de Billy, since 1988.

Although the business started without a scrap of vineyard to its name, a situation that persisted until 1955, Pol Roger currently owns 55 ha largely in and around Épernay. On the Côtes des Blancs these include sites in the Grands Cru villages Cramant, Chouilly and Avize, and Premier Cru villages Grauves and Cuis. On the Montagne de Reims they own vineyards in Grand Cru, Ambonnay, Bouzy and Verzy, and Premier Cru Trépail, as well as numerous lesser vineyards.

I always find great style and finesse in Pol Roger. There are a number of non-vintage and vintages cuvées available. The non-vintage cuvées, of which there are two, are characterised by the inclusion of one-third each of Chardonnay, Pinot Noir and Pinot Meunier. In my experience the Brut Réserve is an excellent example of the style. I have little experience of the demi-sec Rich. The Chardonnay Vintage is the Pol Roger blanc de blancs, and is very good indeed, and there is also a vintage Rosé. But the two wines on which the house has earned such a tremendous reputation are the vintage Brut and the prestige cuvée, Cuvée Sir Winston Churchill.

The Brut Vintage Champagne is one of Champagne's greatest wines, and is certainly a contender for 'wine of the vintage' in many years. It is a blend of 40% Chardonnay and 60% Pinot Noir, the only relatively recent exception being the 1966, which had 65% Pinot Noir, although some vintages from the first half of the 20th Century were up to 80% Pinot, and the 1928 was, exceptionally, 100% Chardonnay. The persistent high quality of the Brut Vintage is down to the combined efforts of the Pol-Roger family, with increasing input from Hubert de Billy, together with chef de caves James Coffinet, who was replaced in 1999 by Dominique Petit, who came to Pol Roger from Krug.

Finally, I cannot fail to discuss in more detail Cuvée Sir Winston Churchill. Pol Roger was Churchill's tipple, and his relationship with the house was cemented when entranced by Odette Pol-Roger, Jacques' wife, when he met her at the British Embassy in November 1944. Churchill became Pol Roger's best, and certainly most influential, customer. He named a winning race horse after Odette, which I think is a compliment. After his death, Pol Roger placed a black border around the labels of Brut NV shipped to the UK. And, in 1984, they released a prestige cuvée named after the great man, starting with the 1975 vintage. The launch of the wine was a grand affair, attended by Lady Soames, Churchill's daughter, who commented of her father, "I saw him many times the better for it, but never the worse." The blend for this cuvée is a closely guarded secret, but it is likely to be a Pinot-dominated cuvée, reflecting the style of wine that Winston preferred. My personal experience of mature vintages would seem to bear this out; the 1986 seemed very Pinot dominated. The 1985 was less so, but was not at full maturity. (17/3/05, updated 20/1/08)

Contact details:
Address: 1 rue Henri de Large, BP 199, 51200 Epernay
Telephone: +33 (0) 3 26 59 58 00
Fax: +33 (0) 3 26 55 25 70
Internet: www.polroger.com

Pol Roger - Tasting Notes

Click to locate stockists.

Pol Roger Brut 2000: A rich golden-yellow hue in the glass, and a rich bead. The nose is truly exuberant, full of rich brioche and cinnamon-tinged pastry, deeper honey-nougat elements mixed with praline, and exotic fruits, pineapple and more. It has purity too though, despite its warm and welcoming character. And with a nose like this, the palate is just as it should be; broad and soft at the edges, full of sweet and juicy exotic fruits, white peach, star fruit and pineapple, cut through at the core with a lovely, mouth-watering acidity. It has a well defined finish and overall some impact despite its very open character, but overall I think this is a wine for drinking now and in the next few years rather than extended cellaring - it's just too delicious to keep too long. From my 2000 vintage Ten Years On tasting. 18+/20 (November 2010)

Pol Roger Brut 2000: A rich, soft golden glow in the glass, with a good central bead surrounded by plenty of small-to-moderate sized bubbles. The nose is just gorgeous, broad and seductive, with elements of brioche, toasted almonds over notes of sweet stone fruit, white peach and more. The palate is just as the nose suggests it will be, generous but not flabby, soft and welcoming like a plumped-up down-filled pillow, enveloping the tastebuds and gently caressing them one by one. And yet it remains bright and lively, with a very linear core of acidity flanked by a finely poised mousse. This is absolutely delicious stuff, so approachable and easy-going and yet clearly of very fine, well-defined quality too. This, to my palate, is ready now - so I suggest you drink on. I've certainly been doing so! For label images and more see my Wine of the Week write-up. 18+/20 (June 2010)

Pol Roger Brut 2000: This wine has an elegant composition with a fresh and crisp delineation beginning on the nose but carrying right through onto the palate also. Very broad in terms of impact, but it is also well framed. Fine substance and depth. I find this to be very approachable now, although it will certainly improve in the cellar given time. From the 2010 annual Champagne Tasting. 17.5+/20 (March 2010)

Pol Roger Brut 2000: A shimmering pale, straw-gold wine here, and a plentiful bead. A fine and elegant nose follows, lightly honeyed and nutty, quite pure and evocative. Rich and full of flavour on the palate, with lots of vivacity from both the lively mousse and the bright, incisive acidity, which is very nicely balanced out by the texture of the wine. Savoury, mouth-watering finish. Great wine which is very approachable now, but which should do very nicely in the cellar for 5-10 years (and maybe a lot longer, knowing Pol Roger). 17.5-18+/20 (December 2009)

Pol Roger Brut 1999: Not quite the first taste of this vintage, but certainly the first encounter at home rather than in a large tasting. The wine has a lemon-gold hue, and a plentiful youthful bead. Aromatically it has some delicious characteristics, led by an array of autolytic aromas, especially notes of bread and porcini mushrooms, backed up by an almond twist. There is a fine freshness to it as well, a vibrant orange zest nuance. Fresh and vivacious on entry, nicely honed at the edges although there is a mild plumpness to the midpalate. Lovely autolytic style here, a prickling and nicely judged mousse too, with a very broad and flavoursome profile. Firm, lightly crisp, delicious but in a less soft style than the recently tasted 2000. This one has more lifted, citrus fruit nuances - rather reminiscent of a silex-terroir Sancerre (in style and composition - it doesn't taste like a Sauvignon!) - and it has great potential for the cellar I think. Fine. 17.5+/20 (September 2010)

Pol Roger Brut 1999: This certainly shows a different character to last year when I suspect it hadn't long been disgorged. Now it has stony fruit on the nose, a very firm style, slightly nutty, elegant but tight and youthful. A lovely palate, creamy and elegantly composed, gently full, broad, stylish and yet fresh and defined. Lots of substance here. really very promising style now which should give plenty of pleasure in the future. A higher score. From the 2009 annual Champagne Tasting. 18+/20 (March 2009)

Pol Roger Brut 1999: This is very youthful, with some residual sweet toffee and mallow aromas with just a faint trace of sulphur. Very softly composed palate, although it shows a good depth and substance in the middle. A nice frame, with sweet and smoky fruit, and good character on the finish. When this wine integrates it will be very good. From the 2008 annual Champagne tasting. 17+/20 (March 2008)

Pol Roger Cuvée Winston Churchill 1999: A refined style on the nose, lightly honeyed with polished fruit and a wisp of smoke. Very elegantly composed. Great harmony, grippy and quite primary and yet still very harmonious. A lovely style, fine composition, clearly tip-top quality. This is wonderful to experience now, but it should be given time in the cellar to reveal its true magnificence. From the 2010 annual Champagne Tasting. 18.5-19+/20 (March 2010)

Pol Roger Brut 1998: This wine has a shimmering lemon-gold hue, and a plentiful and quite fine bead. there follows a nose that is at first quite rich, showing aromas of roasted honey, caramel and brazil nuts, but with a little time it seems finer and lifted, with more lemony fruit. Quite a rich and open style on the palate too, although it starts off rather awkward and full-on. But with a little time it shows a very composed nature, elegant and bright, although with a creamy, caramel-tinged finish. It has a rather backwards feel to it at the end, but there is plenty of pleasure here all the same, and surely some potential for the cellar yet. Very good indeed. A Christmas wine. 17.5+/20 (December 2008)

Pol Roger Brut 1998: This wine has a great bead, very lively, and there is plenty of it. It is seemingly quite well matured already on the nose, the initial yeastiness has gone, and it now seems warm and welcomely nutty. This is followed up by a seductive palate which has an underlying firmness rather than being totally soft. It has good finesse, and some grip towards finish. There is lots of substance here although it always keeps its rounded, creamy, textured harmony. A very complete wine right through to finish, this is delicious and has shown really very good development. Ready now. From my 1998 vintage Ten Years On tasting. 17.5+/20 (November 2008)

Pol Roger Brut 1998: This is the first of the bottles from my cellar, and it is instructive to see how the wine fares tasted in a relaxed environment, with time for reflection and contemplation, as opposed to the bustling annual Champagne tasting. It has also, of course, almost another year under its belt since I last tasted it. Today it has a pale straw hue, and a moderately fat bead. The nose is immediately seductive, showing the nutty and slightly yeasty-bready elements of youth, but with a plump honey-tinged richness. But there is a freshness too. On the palate is does indeed start off soft and seductive, before tightening up a little in the midpalate, but never really withdrawing. It has a toothsome, rounded mouthfeel and a crisp, leafy definition towards the finish. Great acidity and a prickling mousse, which both combine very nicely with the plump nature, which builds to a more creamy style, to give a very complete package. This has come on very nicely since my tasting in March 2007. It finishes well, has more mineral character than before, and plenty of interest and potential, upon which you can reflect as the flavours linger on the tongue. Very good indeed, and a score that continues to creep upwards. For label images and more see my Wine of the Week write-up. 17.5+/20 (February 2008)

Pol Roger Brut 1998: Unlike last year when it was open and charming, today this wine seems quite closed down. But there are some primary aromas here, lemon freshness and even a little touch of honey. And some exotic fruits. A very composed palate, with good substance, acidity and a fresh mousse. But it is very tight today, and clearly needs a few more years yet (so I will leave those in my cellar untouched). From the 2007 Champagne Information Bureau Tasting. 17+/20 (March 2007)

Pol Roger Brut 1998: There is evident finesse here, with nuances of nutty, honeyed, oiled oak all presented in a gentle fashion. There is fine structure on the palate, with correct acidity and a gentle, creamy mousse. It still displays rather simple primary flavours. Has a perfumed character. Just too youthful at present - this will come good with time in the cellar, 3-4 years at least. From the annual Champagne Information Bureau Tasting. 16.5+/20 (March 2006)

Pol Roger Brut Chardonnay 1998: Quite characterful, open, evocative even. It has a full style, and yet also has some elegance. There are notes of nettles and flower petals, youthful aromas that precede the complexity this wine can display with age. Peppery. Lovely fruit style. Very good indeed, with fine potential. From the 2007 Champagne Information Bureau Tasting. 17+/20 (March 2007)

Pol Roger Brut Rosé 1998: A pale, onion skin hue, and a lovely nose, demonstrating a refined, mineral-infused quality. The palate is broad and expressive, showing some finesse, some marzipan nut character, moderate acidity and a nicely balanced structure. This is very good, and is for current drinking in my opinion. From the annual Champagne Information Bureau Tasting. 16.5/20 (March 2006)

Pol Roger Cuvée Winston Churchill 1998: Very cold when served, so allowed to warm. It opens up to reveal polished wood and nut oil aromas. The palate is a harmonious, nut-infused affair, with honey-tinged dried fruits. Impressive, but still youthful, rather reserved, a little diffuse and lacking in direction today. Nevertheless there is potential here. From the 2009 annual Champagne Tasting. 18-18.5+/20 (March 2009)

Pol Roger Cuvée Winston Churchill 1998: A reserved nose, a touch honeyed and mealy, but a little reticent really. A fine palate, rich yet stylish, with a big and impressive, rounded character with more mealy-nuttiness like that on the nose. This is still very youthful but shows elegance combined with brooding potential. Currently one for the cellar, not drinking, and in time I think this will be excellent. From the 2008 annual Champagne tasting. 17.5-18+/20 (March 2008)

Pol Roger Brut 1996: A good intensity to the colour here, but still a restrained rather than an evolved hue, and a moderately fine bead. Very well honed on the nose, with nicely defined aromas, ground almonds among fresh apple and pear fruit with a lemony edge, with just the barest hint of mushroom. But this still seems very youthful and linear on the nose, and it comes across the same on the palate, although it does broaden and soften in the middle, revealing lightly nutty fruit and baked lemon with a tangy citrus character. It is very lightly autolytic, lightly honeyed, maturing and it shows this more with a slightly higher temperature in the glass. This is deliciously approachable now, although it still has a long way to go yet before it reaches real maturity. Great acidity and a very fine, crisp mousse too, giving this savoury, meaty wine a great lift. Very fine. From my 1996 Vintage Fifteen Years On tasting. 18/20 (December 2011)

Pol Roger Brut 1996: A pale golden colour, showing a little depth of hue, but not at all deep or obviously mature. The bead starts off a little fat, but then calms down to a moderately small size. Very open and welcoming on the nose, starting off with some fresh citrus fruit before it slowly reveals a little early complexity in the shape of some gently nutty praline, with some biscuit and apple notes from the Pinot. Beautifully poised palate, with a wonderful balance of creamy, welcoming texture with well defined acidity and some sherbet-tinged bready flavour. A lovely, delicate, prickly mousse which gives a lot of brightness and should last well in the cellar. There's also a meatiness which I often associate with Pinot-dominate wines. A gently fading finish. Overall really very good indeed, with the structure for future development over the coming years. From a 1996 Champagne tasting. 18+/20 (August 2007)

Pol Roger Brut 1996: A moderate colour with a plentiful bead. Rich nose, dripping with cream and smoky-stony-cordite white fruit, and a leafy minerality. Gorgeous. Creamy palate, with bready-lemony fruit and a correct texture enveloping great acidity, with a little caramel twist. Beautiful wine, with stunning potential. Needs ten years to show its best I think. A Christmas Wine. 17.5+/20 (January 2005)

Pol Roger Brut 1995: A rich and golden hue, with a fine, sparse bead. A fine, nutty and mature character on the nose, certainly a little more evolution than my previous two tastings, yet there is a little note of steel here too. Lovely, rounded, full yet well balanced on the palate, with a fine depth but with freshness too. Quite organic in character, with a long and fresh and meaty finish. Still full of potential for the cellar, but just fine now. The score for this one just keeps creeping up! From a 1995 Champagne tasting. 18+/20 (August 2007)

Pol Roger Brut 1995: A pale, golden hue with very fine, sparse bead. Honeycomb and breadcrumb nose, with floral and citrus tones, and the just perceptible notes of toffee richness. Fresh palate, with a lovely, fine yet firm mousse. Showing just a little more richness than my last tasting, and a little more evolved too, with notes of acacia and juniper. Cracking acidity gives it a lovely, piercing freshness though. Clean finish. This is lovely. Should drink well over the next 5-10 years. 17.5+/20 (January 2006)

Pol Roger Brut 1995: A good, although fairly pale hue, and a tiny bead. Fresh nose; floral, acacia notes, with a nutty breadcrumb nuance. Full, creamy palate, with lovely weight, offset by fresh, sharp acidity. A firm mousse. An elegant style. Beautiful drinking now, but will be better in 5-10 years time. A Christmas Wine. 17+/20 (January 2005)

Pol Roger Brut Chardonnay 1995: A fairly rich hue for a Blanc des Blancs, and a rather surprising meaty character to the nose as well. In character though it seems correct, with an evolving coffee and toffee seam belying the Chardonnay base. As it opens in the glass it reveals a little more minerality to the profile too. The mousse is nicely rounded, with a nice creamy-toffee flavour and as the nose suggested a full, meaty style on a broad base. This is stylish and even seems a little opulent, but overall it is very good indeed. From a 1995 Champagne tasting. 17.5+/20 (August 2007)

Pol Roger Cuvée Winston Churchill 1993: This wine has a shimmering, vinous golden hue in the glass, and a powerful stream of very fine bubbles. The nose speaks very much of Pinot, kicking off with a creamy and biscuity seam, touched with rich and meaty overtones, with a slightly honeyed edge. On the palate this rich character sits at the fore to begin with, although it has a rather soft and broad style, perhaps surprisingly so. Despite the vintage I was expecting something rather more taut and focused. Although it is backed up by some soft acidity there is, however, a very fine and precise bead which does something to improve the vigour of the wine. Thankfully, there is rather more structure coming through the midpalate and towards the finish, giving a much better definition in the mouth. With a little time it begins to shows a fabulous composition on the palate, less soft, beautifully balanced, fresh and harmonious, with nutty-biscuity character. Long too. Overall this is a lovely wine with plenty of character, which is true to the Winston Churchill style, and which is eminently drinkable. A really good effort in a less than enthralling vintage for the region. For label images and more see my Wine of the Week write-up. 18+/20 (January 2010)

Pol Roger Brut 1990: Incredibly it seems as though it is four years since I last drank a bottle of this, and this is my final bottle. That may be a good thing, as this wine is certainly going over compared to where it was in 2002. A pale, golden hue and a fine but plentiful bead. It is very evolved on the nose, rather winey, with a touch of sweet, lemon fruit pastille and some mushroomy nuances. Lovely definition on the palate nevertheless, well poised, with fine acidity and a little creaminess to the texture. Certainly maturing ever onwards now, and I don't think this matched up to the bottles tasted previously. Drink up if you have any. A Christmas Wine. 17.5/20 (December 2006)

Pol Roger Brut 1990: It's almost a year since I last opened one of these. A lovely colour, and a fine bead. Wow - what a nose! It's full of coffee, toffee and crème caramel aromas. Great body and a surprisingly lively mousse considering this wines age. More coffee and toffee flavours, with strong acidity which suggests that this fantastic wine has years of potential ageing yet. 18+/20 (August 2002)

Pol Roger Brut 1990: A very fine but prominent bead. Muted at first, but with just a little bit of aeration there came aromas of coffee and caramel, toffee and just a suggestion of nuts. Delicious palate, with a soft, restrained but prickling mousse and well balanced acidity supporting a mature, creamy rich texture. Flavour-packed, with almonds, coffee and caramel. The finish at first seemed a little short and tart but this also settled, developing a powerful length after the first glass. Will develop further. 18/20 (September 2001)

Pol Roger Cuvée Winston Churchill 1986: A second vintage which slipped in at the end! Delightful, mature, very expressive nose of oiled wood and cheese. Mature fruit on the palate, with a fresh and foaming mousse. Very firm acidity. Much fuller and more mature than the previous vintage, but with a little less finesse. Ready now. Beautiful. From a Prestige Cuvée tasting. 18/20 (September 2004)

Pol Roger Cuvée Winston Churchill 1985: Very evolved, mature, organic nose. Very correct palate, balanced, creamy palate with great finesse. Still has some pure, honeyed white fruits. Lovely freshness, but evolving with great style. Ready now but should drink for a further five to ten years without difficulty. Beautiful. From a Prestige Cuvée tasting. 18.5/20 (September 2004)

Tasting notes are ordered by date of tasting, most recent first. I have tried to indicate whether it is a tasting of a new release, or of a wine I have cellared.

Pol Roger Pure Brut Nature NV: Current release. Approximately one-third each of the three main varieties. This has a very clean and herbal white fruit style, quite crystalline, suggestive of white grapes coated in a little sugar crunch, also floral, with a little note of toffee behind it. There is certainly a little creamy-caramel scent too. Still very youthful on the palate, not totally composed, with some sweet whisky-mash notes coming in at the edges. Youthfully disjointed and needing to come together. Although there is a school of though that says zero-dosage cuvées shouldn't be aged, this certainly needs to be left to integrate for a few months at the very least. Lovely freshness though; it should be fine given time. From a tasting with Villeneuve Wines. 16-17+/20 (November 2010)

Tasting notes are ordered by date of tasting, most recent first. I have tried to indicate whether it is a tasting of a new release, or of a wine I have cellared.

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: Current release. As with the Pure Brut Nature served alongside, this is as usual a blend of approximately one-third each of the three main varieties. This has much more meat to it compared to the non-vintage 'Pure' cuvée, showing subtle elements of apple and biscuit; the Pinot Noir in this blend seems to be rather more expressive. And there is greater breadth to it on the palate as well, this certainly being the benefit of a sensitive dosage. It shows a fuller mousse and a more developed and integrated substance. Polished, still rather reserved but this is certainly accessible. As is often the case, an attractive wine. From a tasting with Villeneuve Wines. 16.5+/20 (November 2010)

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: The base vintage here is 2005, the blend the usual one-third each of Chardonnay, Pinot Noir and 10% Pinot Meunier, and the dosage 10 g/l. A very pale hue in the glass, fresh and crisp and feminine in style, followed by a rather rich and fleshy style on the palate. Quite accessible at present, more so than expected from that crispy-fruit nose, with a broad and fresh presence of fruit here, highlighted by a beautiful floral character. Very fine. From the 2010 annual Champagne tasting. 17+/20 (March 2010)

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: A fresh and fairly pale hue even now, this being my last half bottle from this particular purchase, made in July 2007. The nose has developed in a quite glorious fashion, and now shows some fine honeyed brioche and crunchy, sweet, honey-roasted cashew nut. Delightful palate, fine mousse, very delicate and precisely defined, with deliciously maturing flavours. Fresh, with substance, and a little length, these have been great and very serviceable bottles. 17/20 (February 2010)

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: Purchased July 2007. Another half bottle from my two cases purchased in Calais. A fairly rich hue, and a fine bead rising from the very centre of the glass. The nose is showing delightful maturity, with little nuances of praline, honey and toffee-coffee aromas. The palate has a fresh mousse, dry and finely poised, with a honey-praline character. A very nice wine, with a good characterful finish and even a little length. 17+/20 (May 2009)

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: Purchased July 2007. I have worked my way through nearly a dozen of these half bottles, and hardly written a note. Another two halves drunk in the last week has prompted me to do so. This wine has a totally correct appearance, and a very fine bead. There follows an enticing and joyous nose, initially lemony and then richer, with praline maturity. A delicious palate, fleshy and broad, but bright, fresh and balanced. There is plenty of flavour here, and a lovely sappy, organic finish. Fine, complete and really very stylish, this is now drinking very nicely. 17+/20 (December 2008)

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: Current release. A sulphurous nose, although it does not obscure the rich white and golden fruits that also reside here, and the traces of honey and nut beneath. A fine style on the palate, there is structure and definition and a fine composition. An elegant style, this is impressive stuff, nicely balancing a slight fruit sweetness and good acidity. From the 2008 annual Champagne tasting. 17+/20 (March 2008)

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: Purchased Summer 2007. From a half bottle. In the glass, it has a pale, straw coloured hue, with a sparse but moderately fat bead which corresponds with the wine's youthfulness. The nose is similarly adolescent, showing a little bready-yeasty character, but also with the characteristics of Pinot Noir which in a young wine gives, as it does here, lots of fresh apples and notes of biscuit. The palate has a good style, a gentle and creamy nature, still a little angular and foamy in character though, but one has to remember that this wine has only just been released. It is attractive, flavoursome, but a touch forceful and obvious, and the profile is very youthful like that found on the nose. It rounds off with a nice, appealingly bitter finish. Here is a wine that is entertaining to drink now, and serves its purpose as a refreshing agent and a lifter of spirits well, but it will undoubtedly benefit from a year or two in the cellar, and I will certainly enjoy watching how it develops over that time period. During that time I would expect the Pinot characteristics to change and mature to a deeper, more meaty character, and while it retains its aromatics it should be fine. For label images and more see my Wine of the Week write-up. 16.5+/20 (August 2007)

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: Current release. Rather reserved, withdrawn, just a little nutty. Served incredibly cold which makes assessment difficult. I left it to warm in the glass. The mousse is good and taut. Refined style, full and creamy. Really well composed, with a little finesse showing on the palate. Delicious. From the 2007 Champagne Information Bureau Tasting. 16.5+/20 (March 2007)

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: Finesse here. Light bready notes, with white fruits. A light bead. Quite sharp acidity, firm and persistent mousse, and a somewhat angular finish. I think this just needs a year or so in the cellar. From a Lay & Wheeler tasting. 15.5+/20 (May 2005)

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: Restaurant stock. Lovely fresh nose. Very typical style on the palate, a blend of equal parts Chardonnay, Pinot Noir and Pinot Meunier. Rich, flavoursome, but with a trace of elegance; lovely balance. Very good. Tasted at The London Carriage Works, Liverpool. 16/20 (October 2004)

Pol Roger Brut Réserve NV: Restaurant stock. Pol Roger NV is a blend of roughly equal parts Chardonnay, Pinot Noir and Pinot Meunier. Good bead. Fresh, yeasty-toasty nose. Good yeasty palate, balanced acidity. Typical Pol Roger class. Tasted at The London Carriage Works, Liverpool. 16/20 (January 2004)