Home > Winedr Blog

Renaissance 2014, Day 1: Amphorae and more

Arriving just as yesterday’s Renaissance tasting opened its doors – in fact I think I got there ten minutes early – was a real advantage. There are some tables where the crowds are usually three deep, but this early in the day the hall was nearly empty, save for the growers themselves, many of whom were still scurrying about bringing in their last few boxes of samples. And so I kicked off with Richard Leroy, who was pouring his 2012s, as was Virginie Joly (pictured below, sharing a joke on a mobile with Thierry Michon – you could submit your own captions for this but I propose “Look at what that Kissack idiot has said about your wines“). It was nice to see the Joly wines down to just 14% (!!) and seemingly free of significant botrytis on the nose and palate. After tasting with Virginie it was then onto Marc Angeli, followed by the Muscadet domaines of Jo Landron and then Domaine de l’Ecu, with Frédéric Niger van Herck, with Guy Bossard hovering somewhere close by (pictured further down the page); it was interesting to learn of (and taste) new experimental wines from these two domaines, both Melon de Bourgogne fermented in amphorae, but being 2013s these wines are stll embryonic). By the time I finished here the hall was really filling up, and I was glad to have had the chance to chat with these growers before the full assault began.

Virginie Joly and Thierry Michon

Thereafter I tasted pretty widely and I have to confess I can’t remember what order things progressed in from here. But it was very good to catch up with Sébastien Riffault, whose 2011s all seem to have a much stronger oxidative character than the more pure, crystalline 2010s last year. In the same part of the world I tasted the wines of Philippe Gilbert which showed nicely. From Touraine I tasted with Yannick Amirault and Sébastien David, both great guys who make excellent wines, one range very pure and traditional, the other completely off-the-wall although the results are very good indeed. I will leave you to figure out which is which.

Frédéric Niger van Herck and Guy Bossard

Some interesting discoveries were made, including Laura Semeria of Château de Montcy, good Romorantin here, and Aymeric Hilaire of Clos Mélaric in Saumur, who makes a very good range of wines, tense and lightly oaked whites and reds that speak of limestone, under the Saumur and Saumur Puy-Notre-Dame appellations.

As always there were some fairly unusual wines here, but it was often the story that was more striking than the wine. Isn’t that often the way? Take the wines of Xavier Caillard for example; just two cuvées, Chenin Blanc and Cabernet Franc, both from the 2005 vintage, and both have spent nine years in barrel and are due for bottling this year. Both, remarkably, tasted clean as a whistle and fresh as a daisy.

I did taste elsewhere, Chinon, Coteau de Loir, Jasnières and also a couple of domaines in Bordeaux (again, interesting stories….) but that’s for another time. I’m off for more tasting today. Full notes, new profiles, updates and reports will be published in the subscriber area in the coming months.

PS. As I will be tasting at the Salon on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday this week I won’t be making my usual site updates; normal service will resume Thursday.

Salon des Vins de Loire: Good Enough?

I made an early start out from Edinburgh on Friday morning and headed down to Angers via Paris. And if it’s Angers….. well, it must be time for the annual Salon des Vins de Loire.

The Salon is the fair for tasting the wines of the Loire and for meeting the growers. If you know how it works, and are familiar with the foibles, poor planning and unimaginative organisation then you can have a great experience here. Many of the region’s top winemakers are here pouring their wines. Sure, some big names (Foreau, Foucault and one or two others) stay away, but all the Huet, Carême, Vacheron, Pépière, Luneau-Papin, Bergerie, Ogereau, Reverdy, Pinon, Landron, Cazin, Oosterlinck, Fouquet, Champalou, Alliet, Baudry, Chidaine, Cady, Cormerais, Villeneuve, Roches Neuves and others (I don’t need to go on with more, do I?) make up for this, more than a hundred times over. And if organic, biodynamic and natural wines are your thing, than you can hook up with the likes of Joly, Angeli (pictured below, at last year’s Renaissance tasting), Pesnot and others in one of the many Salon spin-off events.

Back to the Loire: Marc Angeli

So there will be plenty of tasting over the next few days, starting with the ‘off’ tastings over the weekend, then the Salon proper on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. But before I sign off (I’m ready for dinner – I think I hear the Brasserie de la Gare calling) I should just return to the issue of poor organisation and weak communication around this conference. This is a chronic problem and I really believe InterLoire should do something to change how this Salon is presented to the public, and how it is run. Only in the past week Jim Budd published a letter from a US importer, forwarded to him by a Loire grower, explaining why he wouldn’t be coming to the Salon. A trade fair that does so much to alienate a valuable trade visitor? That really is something InterLoire should take notice of. To add fuel to the fire, another grower got in touch with me today to complain about the communication around the Salon, in particular the poor quality of the website (I certainly concur with that) and also – considering this fair is supposed to attract an international clientele – the lack of any language other than French. What about English? Or Chinese? (Later edit: it has since been pointed out to me that the site does have a Google translation menu, but that is a poor service for those who don’t speak French, and only adds to the amateurish feel of the site in my opinion).

To me the Salon des Vins de Loire seems stagnant. I will always come, because the tasting opportunities are unparalleled and I have contacts in and around the system so I can sort out my visit with ease. Others will not be so well connected, and will be more easily dissuaded from visiting. The only major change I have seen in six years of attending the Salon (other than a remarkable decline in attendance by UK journalists – why is that I wonder?) was a temporary move of the dates a few years ago, which I still believe – regardless of any denials – was done to divorce the Salon from the ‘off’ events which benefited from its existence but which contributed no revenue. But these ‘off’ events in themselves attract a lot of visitors, so this was a classic case of InterLoire shooting itself in the foot. But at least it showed that change is possible; the next change for new InterLoire president Gérard Vinet to consider might well be revolutionising the backroom organisation and the communication surrounding the event. There’s nothing wrong with the venue, or the growers, or the wines; these are good enough. It’s how the rest of it ticks behind the scenes that needs reinvigorating.

2013 Winedoctor Disclosures

For several years now I have made an annual statement of support for Winedoctor; a way of ensuring transparency regarding who in Bordeaux and the Loire Valley (and anywhere else for that matter) helps me out, so that readers can take this into account when I report on the wines. I used to store these disclosure statements in my ‘Features’ section, and although this part of the Winedoctor website is still free to read, outside the paywall, I thought I should bring my disclosure statement out onto the blog lest I be criticised for hiding it in an inaccessible corner of the website.

I would usually publish this review in late December but the past six weeks have been particularly hectic chez Winedoctor, hence the delay.

First of all, as is customary, some details of support and other benefits received during the course of 2013:

InterLoire: Through Sopexa, who currently handle marketing for InterLoire, the generic promotional body for most of the Loire’s appellations, I received support to attend the Salon des Vins de Loire in Angers in February. I was reimbursed the cost of my petrol, airport parking, flights and rail fares in France. InterLoire also paid two nights accommodation directly to my hotel. I paid for the other nights myself. In addition, I also accepted a trip to the Muscadet region in spring, funded by InterLoire and arranged through Sopexa. Costs involved included flights from Edinburgh to Nantes, via London City Airport, accommodation for two nights, transport over three days, and subsistence including lunches and two ‘winemaker dinners’.
Le Bureau Interprofessionnel des Vins du Centre: I accepted two nights accommodation in a hotel in Chavignol, the expense met by the BIVC, the regional body for the Central Loire appellations including Sancerre, Pouilly-Fumé and so on. Other expenses I met myself.
Bouvet-Ladubay: I attended a spectacle, a party in the Bouvet-Ladubay cellars during the 2013 Salon des Vins de Loire. I took advantage of free transport there from Angers and back again at the end of the evening.
Yvon Mau: I was grateful for accommodation provided by the Bordeaux négociant Yvon Mau during the primeurs week. I accepted five nights in a left-bank château, uncatered accommodation and possibly the most spooky stay in Bordeaux I have ever experienced – I was alone in a very big cru bourgeois château, in the wilds of the Médoc. Other aspects of the trip and expenses I met myself (see below).
Gifts received: A Christmas hamper from Sopexa, sent to all journalists who submitted suggestions for the Cracking Wines from France tasting. I received two bottles of wine, from Domaine Luneau-Papin and Les Vignerons du Pallet, during my trip to Muscadet.
Samples received: a small number of wine samples were received, principally from UK merchants such as Cadman Fine Wines and Hyde Park Wines, and where the wines have been written up this has been declared.
Lunching and dining: I accepted dinner on one night paid for by Yvon Mau at Les Sources de Caudalie during the Bordeaux primeurs. I also had lunch at Château Haut-Bailly. I had lunch with Claude Lafond, in Reuilly (pictured below). During the Salon des Vins de Loire I had dinner with Claude Papin, Vincent Ogereau and Yves Guégniard which the three vignerons paid for.

On the whole I think I have managed to cut back further on my dependence/association with the wine trade in 2013. Much of the costs associated with my trips to Bordeaux and the Loire I have met myself, and in each case outside funding has come from négociants or generic bodies rather than individual producers. The only other region I visited during 2013 was Madeira, again I funded this myself. I have not taken any other press trips, single producer or otherwise.

2013 Winedoctor Disclosures

As is customary I also document below the expenses I met myself during the course of 2013:

London, Loire Benchmark: I met the cost of a trip to London for the Loire Benchmark Tasting, principally for the Loire 2012 vintage. Costs included rail fare to London and subsistence.
Angers: Most travel expenses for the Salon des Vins de Loire were met my InterLoire, but I paid for three nights in a hotel and all my subsistence other than my dinner with Claude Papin & co (see above).
Bordeaux, Primeurs: I travelled to Bordeaux for a week and met my travel costs myself; this includes transport to airport, flights to Bordeaux, and hire car for eight days. Other than one meal paid for by Yvon Mau I met all subsistence costs myself. I paid for two nights in a hotel in Libourne to complement my stay in the château on the left bank.
London, RAW and Real Wine Fairs: In 2013 these fairs were at different times (I enjoyed the convenience of ‘competing’ fairs in 2012) and I paid for travel from Edinburgh to both, by train in each case, myself. Extra costs were incurred in each case, (a) by missing my train and having to stay overnight in London for one, and (b) hitting a deer on the way home from the railway station on the other. These were expensive tastings to attend; I probably could have bought all the wines I tasted online and had them shipped to Edinburgh for less than the cost of the repairs to my car. Such is life. Still, I suppose I came off better than the deer.
Madeira: I covered the costs of transfers, flights, hire car and accommodation in Madeira myself. I paid for travel to visit Barbeito and Blandy’s.
London: Costs associated with attendance at four London tastings in March, September, October and November, these being the Union des Grands de Bordeaux, Institute of Masters of Wine, Cru Bourgeois and Bordeaux Index tastings were met by me. In the latter case this was by train; for the other three tastings, the costs included flights from Edinburgh, transfers, parking and so on.
Loire, Harvest Trip: I covered the expenses incurred during this trip, including parking and flights, myself. I did not pay for the two nights in Chavignol (see above). I stayed and travelled with Jim Budd so there were no other accommodation costs, but I contributed towards subsistence.
Bordeaux, Harvest Trip: I covered the cost of this trip myself; this includes flights from London and back to Edinburgh, airport parking, hire car for four days, subsistence and three nights in Bordeaux hotels.

That concludes my disclosure statement for 2013. As indicated above, I have added disclosures to wine sample reviews where appropriate, so I hope transparency is adequate. As for the year ahead I will, as I stated in my recent report on the Gitton Père et Fils Sancerre X-elis, be focusing on Sancerre and other Central Loire appellations (as I have neglected them for so long, and my enthusiasm has been reignited by my recent trip to the Loire), reporting on Loire 2013, and expanding my coverage throughout. For Bordeaux, I will have my usual cycle of Bordeaux reports (expect detail on the 2013, 2012, 2010 and 2004 vintages, as well as from-my-cellar reports on 2001 and 1999), more Bordeaux profiles for smaller estates (smaller in ambition, and in price too) from left and right banks, and the completion of my Bordeaux guide (at which point I move onto the Loire, a daunting prospect indeed). Santé!

2013 Reflections: Loire

It has been a busy year for me as far as the Loire is concerned. I visited in February, staying over for five days for the Salon des Vins de Loire, visiting the Renaissance and Dive Bouteille tastings at the same time. I returned in June, passing a couple of days in the Muscadet region, visiting and tasting at a handful of top domaines. Finally, I returned in October, making some harvest-time visits with Jim Budd in Bourgueil, St-Nicolas-de-Bourgueil, Vouvray, other Touraine vineyards, Reuilly, Menetou-Salon, Sancerre and Pouilly-Fumé. As a consequence I have made 90 Loire updates to Winedoctor this year, including tasting and vintage reports, reports on latest releases from a number of domaines, as well as new profiles and profile updates. This doesn’t include my weekend wine reports, which also tend to feature the Loire. I can’t be sure how many new tasting notes or words written that would translate into, other than “a lot”.

A scan through my tasting notes reveals about fifteen wines that really rose a notch above all the wines of the Loire Valley that I tasted and drank this year. Unsurprisingly, these make for a roll-call of the great and the good from the Loire.

From Muscadet, both the Muscadet Sèvre et Maine sur lie Le L d’Or 2012 and the Muscadet Sèvre et Maine Château-Thébaud Clos des Morines 2010 showed superb potential; both were samples from cuve though (the Château-Thébaud cuvée is a cru communal prototype which sees three years on the lees before bottling). In each case new blood is at least partially responsible; at Luneau-Papin, Pierre-Marie Luneau and his wife Marie Chartier (pictured below) are now in charge, while at Domaine de la Pépière Rémi Branger works alongside Marc Ollivier.

Loire 2013

Although I found some enticing examples of Sancerre and Pouilly-Fumé this year, from the likes of Vacheron, Pierre Martin and Jonathon Pabiot, none really pushed all the buttons required to make it into my list of favourite wines. And as I haven’t really got to grips with the Côte Roannaise, that means all our other wines come from the Loire heartland of Anjou, Saumur and Touraine. Well, just Anjou and Touraine, actually.

I have always been keen to promote the Loire as an excellent source of dry white wine and also red wine, rather than just the sweet wines which are already widely appreciated, nevertheless my look back at 2013 might suggest that sweet wines rule the roost. Two dry wines, the 2009 Les Noëls de Montbenault and 2005 Les Noëls de Montbenault from Richard Leroy were superb, but no other dry wines could quite match up to their performance, although to be fair many wines from the likes of Pithon-Paillé came close, clearly showing what an exciting source of dry whites the Anjou appellation can be.

Loire 2013

It was the sweet wines that dominate my memories of 2013 though, in particular from Château Pierre-Bise and Domaine de la Bergerie, many of which I tasted with proprietors Claude Papin and Yves Guégniard early on in the year. From Claude, the 2011 Chaume was an absolute delight, really the equal of his 2010 Quarts de Chaume. But from Yves three vintages of his Quarts de Chaume, 2011, 2009 and 2007, served in succession were simply breathtaking, the 2007 tear-jerking in its lifted purity and almost ethereal aromatics. I have been tucking the Pierre-Bise wines – dry as well as sweet of course – away in the cellar for some time, but if anyone would like to tell me where I can get hold of Yves’ wines (other than at the ‘cellar door’) I would be very interested to know. Why does nobody import these wines?

The region with the biggest and best showing, though is Touraine, where my favourite wines come in all forms, sparkling, white, red and sweet. I have had some superb experiences with the Chinons of the 2009 and 2010 vintages recently, having featured many from Bernard Baudry, Couly-Dutheil and Philippe Alliet as my ‘weekend wines’, but it is the first of these three domaines that put on the greatest show, with the 2009 Chinon La Croix Boissée, a stunning wine set to do great things in the future. Looking further back in time though, the 1989 Chinon Clos de la Dioterie from Charles Joguet, tasted later in the year, was also a striking wine.

Loire 2013

Otherwise Vouvray is the order of the day, with one lonely Montlouis popping up. The latter is a wine I have featured before, and simply can’t praise enough, the 2008 Clos Habert Demi-Sec from François Chidaine; this is a stunning wine which takes my breath away whenever I taste it. To be fair though, François (pictured above) has a superb portfolio with an amazing combination of high quality and consistency. Why he hasn’t been elevated to the level of Dagueneau, Clos Rougeard or similar I can’t understand; buy these wines while you still can is my advice.

One young upstart who makes it into my list is Vincent Carême, across the river in Vouvray; I am sure he and his wife Tania would rather I talk about his still wines, which are of a very good quality, but I am still having too much fun with the sparkling 2008 L’Ancestrale. Otherwise, the old guard still dominates, with a trio of Moelleux Réserve cuvées from Philippe Foreau – the 2009, 2005 and 2003 – all simply breathtaking in their depth and complexity, the 2002 Pétillant Réserve and 2008 Le Mont Demi-Sec from Domaine Huet both remarkable, and the 2009 Cuvée Alexandre from Domaine des Auibuisières showing huge potential.

Loire 2013

In the case of Foreau, I see no need for further comment; the wines here can frequently be stunning. The wines of Huet deserve a few clarifying words though; there have been concerns raised about a number of wines from this domaine, especially in the 2002 vintage, where there have been reports of oxidation. This wasn’t an issue with this bottle (pictured above, and drank sometime back in February) but I will have more detail on this in the next few weeks, in a forthcoming report covering younger and older (the range is from 2002 to 2012) vintages of sparkling and sec Vouvray from this domaine, looking both at quality (in 2012 especially) and at whether or not the wines show any signs of oxidation.

It has been a great year for Loire drinking and buying, with 2009 and 2010 giving us great reds, 2009, 2010 and 2011 giving us some superb sweet wines from Anjou, 2010 and 2012 being very fine vintages for Muscadet and 2012 a tip-top year for Touraine and Central Vineyard Sauvignons. Sadly, 2013 probably won’t live up to any of these high standards, but there is always 2014 I suppose……

Tomorrow, all going well, a look back at Bordeaux.

2013 Reflections

It’s that time where all wine writers want to look back on the year just gone, often through choosing a list of favourite wines from the last twelve months, or a count of articles published and words written, books published or awards won. In fact, maybe that time of year has already passed – it is something most writers seem to want to get out of the way by Christmas, even though it seems quite likely that festive drinking should throw up a few bottles eligible for the “best wines” list. I know mine has.

In previous years I have often published a more tongue-in-cheek review of the year, accounts of my mishaps and misadventures in the pursuit of wine knowledge. This year wasn’t really short of such misadventures, perhaps the most dramatic of which occurred during my journey home after judging at the Decanter World Wine Awards. Having travelled back up from London by train I made my way home from the train station by car. Travelling along unlit country roads, very late at night, it was pretty quiet; with a lone car coming towards me in the opposite direction I dipped my headlights, reducing (sadly) my ability to see into the dark gloom ahead. And then it appeared in the beam of the headlights, a life-form, alien-like, a brown body seemingly floating above the ground. Within an instant I perceived four spindly legs – so not ‘floating’ at all then – and each leg was trying to go in a different direction. I’m afraid an instant later the strange being made contact with the front of my car.

Deer Damage, May 2013

Being a very small deer – it all happened so fast that the impact had occurred before I even realised what this strangely put-together lifeform with no head (which must have been bent down, or perhaps up out of the beam of my dipped headlights) could be – the damage to my car (as above) was not that great. You can still see bits of fur embedded in the bumper. The photograph doesn’t show the dent on the bonnet where I believe its head impacted. I checked the deer – it was quite dead, and having been travelling at 60 mph (spot on the speed limit) I am certain it was, thankfully, killed instantly. The repairs were not cheap though, despite the unimpressive appearance above. I am afraid my attendance at the Decanter World Wine Awards turned out to be rather more expensive than expected.

I am sure that, if I were to sit and reflect, I would find other droll or disastrous moments during 2013 to discuss (not least being refused admission to the last train to Scotland in Kings Cross Station later in the year because, despite the fact it had not left the platform, the doors were locked ready for departure), but it is the requirement to “sit and reflect” that is the problem. This year I haven’t really had much time to spend on thinking, or reflecting, or planning. The reason is that I have been working so hard on improving and expanding the information behind the Winedoctor paywall, which was established on March 31st this year, in order to give my subscribers the best possible service for their money. It has been this move to running a subscription service, more than anything else, that I will remember when I think back to 2013.

The move from funding Winedoctor through advertising to a subscription service was not one I undertook lightly. Who would subscribe? How many? How much to charge? There was some welcome support from a number of quarters, including Will Lyons (of the Wall Street Journal) and Gavin Quinney (of Château Bauduc) and I very much appreciated their words at the time. Interestingly, there were also a couple of snarky comments from better established wine writers; I know the wine writing world is not without its fair share of bitchiness, but the willingness of some higher up the wine-writing ladder to take a kick from above was certainly new to me.

Although nerve-wracking (and also exciting at the same time), the move to a subscription basis has also been quite a liberating experience, because I no longer worry about vanity metrics such as Klout and other ranking systems, many of which tend to reflect how active you are on social media. Such ranking systems never take into account how many subscribers you have – in other words, how many people are willing to pay for what you write. It is my subscribers that matter now, and I am happy to say there are many hundreds. I’m looking forward to the day (hopefully!) when I can write thousands instead of hundreds. Who knows, it might just come.

Madeira terraces, July 2013

I would like to thank all my subscribers for their support during 2013; it was a sink-or-swim year for Winedoctor, and I am delighted that Winedoctor is front-crawling along very confidently, hopefully based on my commitment to keep visiting and exploring my two regions of interest, Bordeaux (two visits this year) and the Loire Valley (three visits this year) plus the occasional other region (this year I also visited and reported on Madeira, above). My year-one target for subscribers (I’m not usually this organised, but I had to draw up some targets for a business plan to submit to the bank and the credit card handling company) was reached ten days after putting up the firewall, and my year-two target after one month. After nine months I am edging towards my year-five target – come April, and the end of the first year of Winedoctor subscriptions, it seems clear I will have to develop some new targets!

I would also like to thank some notable UK retailers and merchants, in particular Giles Cooper of Bordeaux Index, Charles Lea of Lea & Sandeman, and the team at Lay & Wheeler, all of whom have been supportive in the last year, either through invitations to significant tastings, or publicising my notes and other writings. Thanks also as always to Jim Budd and Richard Bampfield, who have been supportive in setting up visits and in Jim’s case even arranging and hosting an entire harvest-time trip.

I shall round off here by wishing all my readers festive best wishes, and much joy in the year to come. Over the next few days I will publish a few reflections on my favourite wines of the year, as well my plans for the year ahead (which will include a Winedoctor-led four-day tour of Bordeaux – full details to follow) and also my annual statement of disclosure, a now-regular ritual that seems to delight some, and infuriate others. All the more reason to press on with it then.

Loire Misunderstood #4: Sancerre; not for the Sauvignon

It’s been a while since I have taken the opportunity to promulgate one of my beliefs regarding the wines of the Loire Valley. Indeed, the last episode seems to have been the Light and Easy-Drinking Reds post that I wrote back in July. Time to get on with another one, I think.

A focus for my updates next year will the central vineyards, i.e. Sancerre, Pouilly-Fumé and Menetou-Salon, long overdue I think, a realisation that came to me when I visited Sancerre and Chavignol earlier this year. When Sancerre is good, I really enjoy it. When it isn’t, it can be pretty horrible stuff. I believe in part this reflects fruit ripeness, as certainly the less appealing wines usually have a fairly raw, green fruit character to them that never appeals to my palate.

This is looking at Sancerre at a very basic level though – after all, anybody can distinguish between unripe and ripe Sauvignon Blanc. You only have to look at the wines of Graves, and contrast those that delay for ripeness (Domaine de Chevalier, Smith-Haut-Lafitte, Brown) with those that tend to pick earlier (Olivier, Carbonnieux) to see what a huge effect picking ripe fruit can have. It’s just the same in Sancerre.

Sauvignon Blanc on a sorting table, October 2013

Where Sancerre starts to get really interesting though is in terroir expression; this is where the wines leave behind the fruit flavours (green or otherwise) that we would normally associate with Sauvignon Blanc (you know the drill – green bell pepper, asparagus and pea, moving to yellow pepper, yellow plum and ultimately passion fruit when ripe) and begin to express characteristics that talk more of the soils that the fruit. I assume this reflects yields as well as ripeness, and perhaps there are other nuances also at play. I aim to find out more next year.

Most of Sancerre is limestone, with terres blanches (classic Kimmeridgian limestone, like Chablis) or caillottes (much more stony soils, often Portlandian/Oxfordian). The major difference this engenders is in the substance of the wine, which is frequently quite bold, firm and structured in style. The flavours can vary from orchard fruit to a more minerally character, reminiscent of white stone. A much rarer terroir is silex, in other words flint; here the wine often seems to have a more lifted, dancing character, with a lacy, filigree style; I often liken it to Mosel Riesling more than any other wine, although obviously it doesn’t have the sweetness or the Riesling character. But look beyond technical issues such as residual sugar, and mere flavours, to the way the wine feels in the mouth, and you will see the similarities. The flavours often tend more towards citrus character, especially tangerine and other orange fruits, all of which would be very surprising to a palate used only to, for example, Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc.

It is really at this stage that Sancerre gets interesting to me. It is strange to think so much New World Sauvignon Blanc was planted to emulate this style, and yet at the very peak of the Sancerre appellation there is really no suggestion on the palate that Sauvignon even has a role here. I come to these wines to sense the soils from which they come, not for the Sauvignon.

Four from the Loire

Four very impressive wines from the Loire Valley, three of which were of some age, recently tasted with Jim Budd. My thanks to Jim for pulling the cork on these; the two Chinons in particular were memorable bottles that contributed in no small way to my ever-continuing, life-long Loire education.

Charles Joguet Chinon Clos de la Dioterie 1989: Showing some maturity, paling in terms of hue, but still fresh and bright. The aromatics are delightful, fresh and expressive, and increasingly complex the more I return to the wine. There is a sweetness to the fruit still, but also a more savoury and evolved quality reminiscent of black bean and soy sauce, perhaps a little balsamic too. Along with this there is a little sliver of green, but not one that detracts from the wine, but instead lifts it up a level. The palate is evolved, still with appealing substance, and also energetic and firm, with a softening texture and evolved characteristics like those on the nose. So long and full. A superb wine. 18.5/20 (October 2013)

Domaine de la Perrière Chinon Vieilles Vignes 1989: From Jean and Christophe Baudry. The colour here is a little deeper and more confident than the Dioterie from Charles Joguet, tasted alongside. It has a smoky and evolved, lifted nose, not so complex as the Dioterie perhaps, but it does seem to look more clearly to the future. The palate is sweet, evolved, with good flesh and depth, and although the evolution is not as apparent as I would have hoped I have to acknowledge that this wine probably has decades ahead of it yet. All the same, right now it feels energetic and bright, polished and long. A very good wine, and one that is potentially great given time. 18/20 (October 2013)

Château du Breuil Coteaux du Layon Beaulieu 2007: A pale golden hue here, and a very classic nose of honey and mineral-schist, with nuances of cinder toffee. The palate has a very fine freshness to it, a bitter and pithy grip which really appeals, being wholly subsumed by the flesh and concentrated fruit of the midpalate. This is tense, with great grip and pithy acidity through the middle. A classically styled and quite exceptional wine, which could age brilliantly, from a relatively (compared to the greats of Anjou) unsung domaine. 17.5/20 (October 2013)

Domaine Ogereau Coteaux du Layon Saint Lambert Cuvée Nectar 1990: An amazing colour, a burnished orange-golden hue, and yet it is bright, with a red-pink hue, almost like a very confused sunset. The nose is redolent of orange zest, coffee and cinder toffee, and shows great character and admirably evolved style. In the mouth it is very rich and broad in keeping with the vintage, and the overall impact of the wine so far. The breadth and sweet polish is matched by some structural elements, which largely come from the bitter grip possessed by the wine, rather than the acidity which seems rather muted, perhaps typical of 1990. The finish is long and pithy, the flavours sweet and tinged with toffee. Overall, this is an excellent wine, and very true to the vintage in question. 17.5/20 (October 2013)

Saumur-Time, and the living . . . .

I think many with a knowledge of the wines of the Loire Valley, when asked to indicate their red-wine favourite, would point to the appellation of Saumur-Champigny. It is perhaps not as widely known as Chinon, the other main contender, where the likes of Couly-Dutheil, Philippe Alliet and Bernard Baudry have been busy turning out excellent wines for many years now. Nevertheless Saumur-Champigny is home to many top-class domaines, not least Clos Rougeard, where the lesser-spotted Foucaults can be found. I’ve never managed to secure an appointment or tasting here, despite sending letters (yes, printed words of French, on paper, stuffed into an envelope, complete with stamp, posted by hand, the full works), making several telephone calls and leaving answer phone messages (all in French, again, in case you were wondering), as well as turning up and simply hammering on the gates with my bloodied fist.

Why the attraction, and all the effort? Quite simply, the furtive Foucault frères turn out the purest examples of Cabernet Franc I have ever tasted, wines with a precision and floral finesse that sometimes makes me wonder whether they have imported something magic from Burgundy to the slopes of Saumur-Champigny. If not the fruit (although you don’t get a lot of Cabernet Franc in Burgundy, so I’m told), then some secret wisdom or skill. The poise and delicate yet confident elegance of their wines defies accurate description I am afraid; you just have to taste them to experience their pointed precision for yourself.

Saumur Château, July 14th, 2010

Something else the brothers – or at least those who are selling the wines – seem to have imported from Burgundy is a taste for grand cru pricing. In recent years the cost of a bottle of Clos Rougeard has rocketed to an unprecedented level. I was annoyed when the top wine, Le Bourg, doubled in price, a jump up which already put it at the very limit of whether I or not I should be buying it for my cellar. When it doubled again, reaching a level in the 2009 vintage four times what I recall paying for the 2003, it was time to call it quits. I’m not saying the wine isn’t worthy of grand cru pricing; after all, I opened with a suggestion that this was perhaps the top red wine of the entire Loire Valley. It’s just that I have other more efficient drains on my bank account (three of them, all teenagers) and I can’t buy wines priced at the current level of Le Bourg as anything other than a very occasional, single-bottle treat. So the problem then is, where next for more regular drinking? Who do we turn to in Saumur-Champigny when Clos Rougeard leaves the party? Naturally I have some preferences, but I recently decided to taste more comprehensively, across perhaps a dozen or so domaines in the Saumur and Saumur-Champigny appellations, to see what sort of quality was on offer, whether my preferences were appropriate, and to guide other buyers of the wines.

With this plan in mind earlier this year I made a concerted effort to update my knowledge of the Saumur and Saumur-Champigny appellations, and I tasted through the wines of the following domaines; Domaine des Roches Neuves, Château de Villeneuve, Château du Hureau, Domaine Filliatreau, Domaine de Nerleux, Château de Chaintres, Domaine du Collier, Clos Cristal, René-Noël Legrand and Château Tour Grise. In each case I was looking for an alternative source, to see where I might spend my Saumur sous with Clos Rougeard no longer an affordable option. I didn’t expect to find a Le Bourg or Le Poyeux replacement in all honesty, but I reasoned and hoped that I could perhaps find something close. Over the next few weeks I will be publishing my Saumur-Time reports, opinions and tasting notes from these encounters, either in the shape of domaine updates, or in new or revitalised profiles; I start today with new notes from one of the most
significant domaines in the Saumur and Saumur-Champigny appellations, Domaine des Roches Neuves, run by Thierry Germain.

Read my first Saumur-Time report, a tasting report on the wines of Domaine des Roches Neuves (subscription required).

Loire 2013: Before and After

Although I have finished my ‘from the vineyard’ Loire 2013 reports there are a few reflections still to make on my week in the Loire, starting with my visit to Domaine Baudry-Dutour. Here I found them busy picking Cabernet Franc for the 2013 Chinon Rosé, using a machine harvester with on-board optical sorting. Although I’ve seen these machines in action a few times now, I don’t recall seeing one so close-up before, and I certainly haven’t seen one with on-board optical sorting (if the image below looks familiar, it’s because I also included it in my Chinon & Bourgueil post).

Loire 2013: machine picking, before

The process is incredibly efficient, and the machine can be fine-tuned to not only to determine how vigorously the grapes are removed, but the optical sorting can also be adjusted to reject more or fewer of the just-picked fruit. As far as I could see a few leaves were removed as well as grapes, but this also happens during hand-picking, when leaves are often pulled off in order to make easier access to the bunches. Here are some bunches before picking:

Loire 2013: machine picking, before

And here is the same vine after picking; almost all the grapes have been neatly removed from their stems, the vine almost untouched:

Loire 2013: machine picking, after

The rejected grapes are dumped into a tray on the side of the machine which the operator – or rather one of a small team of men running the machine – emptied out at the end of each row. In the image below he is picking through the rejected fruit, ensuring that the optical sorting is appropriately tuned. During the process he conferred with the vineyard proprietor, Jean-Martin Dutour, as to whether or not he would like to adjust the settings in order to reject more/less fruit.

Loire 2013: machine picking, discarded fruit

Below is the accepted fruit, after it has been dumped into a trailer ready to be taken into the winery. The berries were certainly in a much better condition than those rejected, although I was somewhat confused by the presence of a few clearly unripe berries, which optical sorting really should have rejected very easily.

Loire 2013: machine picking, selected fruit

Despite this experience I remain somewhat unconvinced by machine-picking, even though I have tasted a number of machine-picked wines that have been very good. My persistent doubt stems from a correlation (a weak one, admittedly) between machine-picking and lower quality in a handful of Bordeaux grand cru classé estates. I say ‘weak’ as it really relates to just a few negative experiences, and I expect there are many other confounding variables involved. I think, perhaps, I should keep more of an open mind about it, especially looking at the quality of the fruit selected here.

I have some videos of the machine in action but will have to edit them first, difficult at the moment as I am currently ‘taking a break’ exploring the beaches, castles and gardens of Northumberland (a very fine part of the country I must say).

Loire 2013: Chinon and Bourgueil

Friday was my final day looking at the vineyards of the Loire during harvest time. Having returned to Touraine on Thursday, this time we struck out west. heading first to Château de l’Aulée near Azay-le-Rideau, followed by several visits in Chinon, Bourgueil and Saint-Nicolas-de-Bourgueil. There was a quick stop in Vouvray before I unfortunately found myself back at the airport in Tours.

Jean-Martin Dutour

At L’Aulée, Marielle Henrion told us she had been picking since September 28th, with alcoholic potentials of about 11%. This doesn’t sound ideal, but bear in mind that Marielle is Bollinger-trained, and specialises in making Crémant de Loire, so lower potentials (and higher acid levels) are just fine here. Then it was on to Domaine Baudry-Dutour, where we met Jean-Martin Dutour (pictured above). Jean-Martin summed up the two main features that he feels will define the vintage. First, there was a warm summer, bringing excellent potential (although we shouldn’t forget some hectares were lost to hail, which hit Chinon, albeit to a lesser extent than in Vouvray). Second, and less positive, a very late harvest, meaning that converting early hopes into quality in the bottle may be rather difficult. He finds phenolic maturity this year better than it was last year in Chinon, when it lagged behind the technical (sugar) maturity somewhat.

In addition he describes having a little rot in the fruit this year, but in small quantities and only present under the skin of the grapes, not visible on the fruit. This doesn’t affect the taste, he says (as an aside - I must admit even with superficial rot on much of the fruit I have seen, Sauvignon Blanc especially, I haven’t once picked up the ‘taste’ of rot in any of them, and believe me I have popped a few furry berries in my mouth the past few days). This sub-surface rot does, says Jean-Martin, fade the colour of the wines, and it can degrade the tannins, making them finer, which caused him to liken the vintage in Chinon to 1997 or 1999, both years with very fine tannins in Jean-Martin’s opinion.

Picking machine with Opti-Grape on-board optical sorting

Out in the vineyard, picking was well underway, although really only for the rosé at present, the fruit coming in with 11% potential. The fruit was being picked by machine with on-board optical sorting (shown above), a relatively new innovation. As for reds, they are obviously looking for a higher potential, and it may be that some chaptalisation is required. Harvesting for the red wines is yet to start.

By the time we left Baudry-Dutour the rain was settling in and it continued on and off for the afternoon. By the time Jim Budd and I found ourselves in the vineyards of Bourgeuil and Saint-Nicolas-de-Bourgueil it was dry again, but as I waited to board my plane at Tours an hour or so later it was raining once again. We took a look up on the mi pente slopes at Jacky Blot’s Domaine de la Butte, which were probably the best tasting red grapes I sampled this week, with sweetly perfumed skins giving real flavour (it is surprising what little flavour most grapes on the vine have) but they also had ripe, clean and brown pips, a contrast to many of the grapes we tasted down on the more sandy soils below where there was obvious methoxypyrazine character in the fruit, and the pips were still green with adherent pulp. Then we called in on Sébastien David (pictured below, clearly in good spirits despite the difficult vintage), who told us his potentials currently ranged from 11.5% to 12.5%, not too bad, but that the acidities were still high at about 6 g/l. As with others, he is hoping for cold weather now to stave off the rot, having given up on obtaining further ripening. His plan was to start picking today (Saturday 12th October). Somewhere along the way we also squeezed in a visit to Frédéric Mabileau, where he clearly runs a very tight ship during harvest time (in fact there are numerous visits made this week I haven’t mentioned, as I have aimed to give a flavour of what we did, not provide a comprehensive summary – but information, report and pictures from all my visits will make it onto Winedoctor somewhere, somehow).

Sébastien David

Before reaching the airport we stopped off at the new Château Gaudrelle facilities, on the road running into Vouvray at Rochecorbon. They lost 50% of the crop in the June hail here. They began picking last Wednesday, starting with the fruit for the bulles. The acidities are still very high indeed here though, up to 8 g/l, and so the vines are certainly not ready to be picked for still wines.

My journey back was uneventful, although I did nearly board a plane to Glasgow instead of Edinburgh by mistake, the two flights leaving from adjacent gates only five minutes apart. Sadly, since I left, Jim Budd reports that the rain has continued and been heavy, further dampening spirits no doubt.

Thanks to all the vignerons I visited in the past week, to the Bureau Interprofessionnel des Vins du Centre who put me up for two nights in Chavignol, and most of all to Jim Budd and CRM for their guidance, chauffeur’s service, introductions and hospitality. You can read those of Jim’s reports that correspond with mine starting here.